From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB858C432C2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600862054F for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="eghD7xF1" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 600862054F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C3B3B6B0005; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:17:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BECCE6B0007; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:17:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B01BF6B0008; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:17:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0246.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.246]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F35B6B0005 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:17:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BBC6824CA16 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:17:22 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75973796724.28.fold72_5d5eb9d044f63 X-HE-Tag: fold72_5d5eb9d044f63 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4945 Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com [209.85.208.194]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id v24so6087911ljj.3 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:17:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rTBq6P5OxsGLjoGVhyAwZM8k0vklyHGTB2oJI82Er7M=; b=eghD7xF1O36vsBrF3R1Ol+O9tfU+0jO9JXTPAGDQj/eD9TEB4fS0VQFijoygPStgr3 10lJjOrWc1bicRYqBtncYZdXUVZQzGo/mCRUFcwwwv+kexKbN1ES5l5Ac30Iyy/VSy6b zUdkmBZi6iQtLRd1ksj9hb1AR/76sVMVefmq8BgklCKkDi+tVqaxFM4AvBWSG3sKDCRC NPA4lDaeoCpS8CsgLxRZg802nWrQPQecGCdXqYctiynPyMIAzYncAW7BXnLuqZdmqiq7 lmNY1mZLDVoPD5SAcNNPdqQCcypDkXcAg+PaiFPMbfZqC2X+xM6M1pHyx+WOo3XdPYs0 eCpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rTBq6P5OxsGLjoGVhyAwZM8k0vklyHGTB2oJI82Er7M=; b=VoenDKky0q7RhVhr0RWsr7m4N3OArxL3iyhr3Dh4HGqURRH0U5EMo5K9yxiP8P0BWR UhQ4Ethd59v65+jPY/6uB4ZAzG0PdUvYp2Kzmf3J03jwzWnZKcBKEsOW5kAV3U20oD3R paxBk8VGUVbqQboMfvmsCo14vCJihvJONGcsvPuylauwl1r7sASMtpDmxsP1OxEcQD/k a3Ifau1n/d8Se3P6bdoX16tdxC/fhUQa2qv8k5CapLo0BZiefcnDEXnwquAQ3gbBzWDF j+RyI6Jw/Lv3MojGiDmK97ruSBzBEH4V3tcyfcc3dzGHU27GqhBcWQqiRHpcIPErgpcR hTFg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfdyopghNcV7kcLLqt3iIL4ZvycpR6crCrkP16EuQeXLUZinHE jg8AHlwQGnl54p/LSOt8r9r+baDOYrUXHvVJqX4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzF1RqhBAB47TPrTDl3zKUBxVzKbXcvNvcrU2oxqh5sJKOV3USfSG9GeeJJkpUMrG8FnoJZki1WHtkUnydqfw8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0f4:: with SMTP id h20mr1893730ljl.10.1569424639817; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:17:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1548057848-15136-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Fabio Estevam Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:17:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Refine memblock API To: Adam Ford Cc: Mike Rapoport , Rich Felker , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Heiko Carstens , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Max Filippov , Guo Ren , Michael Ellerman , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, Yoshinori Sato , Richard Weinberger , x86@kernel.org, Russell King , kasan-dev , Geert Uytterhoeven , Mark Salter , Dennis Zhou , Matt Turner , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, uclinux-h8-devel@lists.sourceforge.jp, devicetree , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, The etnaviv authors , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Rob Herring , Greentime Hu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Stafford Horne , Guan Xuetao , arm-soc , Michal Simek , Tony Luck , Linux Memory Management List , Greg Kroah-Hartman , USB list , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Paul Burton , Vineet Gupta , linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "David S. Miller" , openrisc@lists.librecores.org, Chris Healy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 9:17 AM Adam Ford wrote: > I tried cma=256M and noticed the cma dump at the beginning didn't > change. Do we need to setup a reserved-memory node like > imx6ul-ccimx6ulsom.dtsi did? I don't think so. Were you able to identify what was the exact commit that caused such regression?