From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5343EC433F5 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 21:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BF3FA6B0072; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BA3F88D0002; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A6CF48D0001; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0007.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.7]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917176B0072 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 17:03:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8AE8249980 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 21:03:17 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79287762834.26.4471CB8 Received: from mail-vk1-f176.google.com (mail-vk1-f176.google.com [209.85.221.176]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F057140004 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id n135so6014314vkf.6 for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:03:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J8s39Hf+0zr8egKm//Mqpb+5/kH7X9BGZ05be3kJ96k=; b=cOVN4o+wgdD7dvKIYdB98sVRw16J+6jzP953f8PKKcHbIu7AgloP8MACx5VtPZm5+k sHDebP5KI0MEGXzKdpagdhmL9ec0ZIp0XSko3YKKQoJSR47669gqTTk+3whwAsVMzRIb cX7MuHhqhJOuPYojwwuxD/ifznzZCfMujTx1hTBOBXGKKrMHcvbfxlE8qrY7jnqg4FSk LanKficLPing2dBDIU3ydpVrdwgNgl50JFncIP1pOy/F76W3tZBx42zDZWFDNjTwVeCU 8736ztS7wIO72EtxaxJ0lh9K53yF+n07XUFgmOcl2i4NLyBgHXaXEgCuqw/NO/p/6Rd3 GllA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J8s39Hf+0zr8egKm//Mqpb+5/kH7X9BGZ05be3kJ96k=; b=x9Ytax0ozBjpSOaTsnxqDN5DIrse6PaABFqcZx39Yss+mDECSV1aU7YUU+Q0GIWBhs 0Qtc2WxJVySQsJ71+L/ZosEC7hoeBKrQH5JGZuNrORNXDSfy57K73pSVAMHvA2HcaCpN l4QCQqqSKUeN+kM52ZDBd+JYqr6uoy/gbNYP2a2EEqSNCFSi9OriFuzEOkR8G5AJjD21 EzYQe7hI4HXPoxEVLo7mHkkKRqq2p6AoMZc1DE2IAA9zSoZznYjzSYI8zz0JY17tcIgP VTZ2pKcXvCUrO5dAggObsAVTK9NgCAy2k8s/GbZADqSJoU6KMqsPWJ90JLR2ZwJgwBXR MiUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Fkzg29CJm2edlN2qW/luNt4XfpC4W1bQPb3GNKYrxRWA8TeQ0 NW1Jg11nG6Ayb0tRlCEFpEp6fXbfeX52bPlrLY5djA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwagl7oEUUX31C3s4tj4gQK/i+pmRpDRgvmBdJJLJAvyM7y8gSo5aR2CqsTEOZb6pMz6zw8hoW9RMAq4c+uORg= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a9cb:0:b0:33e:d145:85f0 with SMTP id s194-20020a1fa9cb000000b0033ed14585f0mr7726646vke.7.1648328595748; Sat, 26 Mar 2022 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220326010003.3155137-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20220326134928.ad739eeecd5d0855dbdc6257@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20220326134928.ad739eeecd5d0855dbdc6257@linux-foundation.org> From: Yu Zhao Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 15:03:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [page-reclaim] Re: [GIT PULL] Multi-gen LRU for 5.18-rc1 To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Aneesh Kumar , Barry Song , Brian Geffon , Catalin Marinas , Daniel Byrne , Dave Hansen , Donald Carr , Hillf Danton , =?UTF-8?Q?Holger_Hoffst=C3=A4tte?= , Jan Alexander Steffens , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Konstantin Kharlamov , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Mike Rapoport , Oleksandr Natalenko , Rik van Riel , Shuang Zhai , Sofia Trinh , Steven Barrett , Suleiman Souhlal , Vaibhav Jain , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , Linux ARM , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-MM , Kernel Page Reclaim v2 , "the arch/x86 maintainers" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Stat-Signature: 6swxx8ff5tek6j1o3hj6d3ks6jty7c5p Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=cOVN4o+w; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of yuzhao@google.com designates 209.85.221.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuzhao@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F057140004 X-HE-Tag: 1648328596-955067 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 2:49 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 19:16:15 -0600 Yu Zhao wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 7:07 PM Linus Torvalds > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 6:00 PM Yu Zhao wrote: > > > > > > > > This is more of an option than a request for 5.18. I'm sending it to > > > > you directly because, in my judgement, it's now as ready as it'll ever > > > > be. > > > > > > So I do expect to merge this, but I don't think it has been in > > > linux-next, has it? > > > > No. I could ask Stephen to see if he is willing to take this series. I > > was hoping to go through Andrew since his tree is what most MM > > developers test. I haven't heard from Andrew, so I assume he has no > > strong opinion and I don't want to put him in a different position. > > hm, sorry, something in the headers here fooled my (elaborate) procmail > rules :( > > Please yes, let's have a cycle in -next. I thought we decided to do > that in discussion with Matthew Wilcox? Will do. > Also, sorry, but I'm not seeing many commonly-seen names amongst the > reviewers. I'd be more comfortable if people who have done most work on > page reclaim up to this time have had time to review and comment. Me too :) Unfortunately I can't dictate others' priorities or methodologies. So I have reset my expectations from getting their reviewed-by's to not getting their NAKs.