linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 12:26:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hH2733FEs4bAroa4zscM_PkshEWEmRw7LwXwVJb9pDWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bAfnCVYz956jPTNQ+AqHJs7uY1ZqWfL8fSUFWQOdKxHcg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:12 AM Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 2:53 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Prepare for hot{plug,remove} of sub-ranges of a section by tracking a
> > section active bitmask, each bit representing 2MB (SECTION_SIZE (128M) /
> > map_active bitmask length (64)). If it turns out that 2MB is too large
> > of an active tracking granularity it is trivial to increase the size of
> > the map_active bitmap.
>
> Please mention that 2M on Intel, and 16M on Arm64.
>
> >
> > The implications of a partially populated section is that pfn_valid()
> > needs to go beyond a valid_section() check and read the sub-section
> > active ranges from the bitmask.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mmzone.h |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  mm/page_alloc.c        |    4 +++-
> >  mm/sparse.c            |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 6726fc175b51..cffde898e345 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -1175,6 +1175,8 @@ struct mem_section_usage {
> >         unsigned long pageblock_flags[0];
> >  };
> >
> > +void section_active_init(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
> > +
> >  struct page;
> >  struct page_ext;
> >  struct mem_section {
> > @@ -1312,12 +1314,36 @@ static inline struct mem_section *__pfn_to_section(unsigned long pfn)
> >
> >  extern int __highest_present_section_nr;
> >
> > +static inline int section_active_index(phys_addr_t phys)
> > +{
> > +       return (phys & ~(PA_SECTION_MASK)) / SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE;
>
> How about also defining SECTION_ACTIVE_SHIFT like this:
>
> /* BITS_PER_LONG = 2^6 */
> #define BITS_PER_LONG_SHIFT 6
> #define SECTION_ACTIVE_SHIFT (SECTION_SIZE_BITS - BITS_PER_LONG_SHIFT)
> #define SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE (1 << SECTION_ACTIVE_SHIFT)
>
> The return above would become:
> return (phys & ~(PA_SECTION_MASK)) >> SECTION_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
> > +static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > +       int idx = section_active_index(PFN_PHYS(pfn));
> > +
> > +       return !!(ms->usage->map_active & (1UL << idx));
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> >  static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >  {
> > +       struct mem_section *ms;
> > +
> >         if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
> >                 return 0;
> > -       return valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
> > +       ms = __nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn));
> > +       if (!valid_section(ms))
> > +               return 0;
> > +       return pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn);
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >
> > @@ -1349,6 +1375,7 @@ void sparse_init(void);
> >  #define sparse_init()  do {} while (0)
> >  #define sparse_index_init(_sec, _nid)  do {} while (0)
> >  #define pfn_present pfn_valid
> > +#define section_active_init(_pfn, _nr_pages) do {} while (0)
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM */
> >
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index f671401a7c0b..c9ad28a78018 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -7273,10 +7273,12 @@ void __init free_area_init_nodes(unsigned long *max_zone_pfn)
> >
> >         /* Print out the early node map */
> >         pr_info("Early memory node ranges\n");
> > -       for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, &nid)
> > +       for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, &nid) {
> >                 pr_info("  node %3d: [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", nid,
> >                         (u64)start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >                         ((u64)end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1);
> > +               section_active_init(start_pfn, end_pfn - start_pfn);
> > +       }
> >
> >         /* Initialise every node */
> >         mminit_verify_pageflags_layout();
> > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> > index f87de7ad32c8..5ef2f884c4e1 100644
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,54 @@ static inline unsigned long first_present_section_nr(void)
> >         return next_present_section_nr(-1);
> >  }
> >
> > +static unsigned long section_active_mask(unsigned long pfn,
> > +               unsigned long nr_pages)
> > +{
> > +       int idx_start, idx_size;
> > +       phys_addr_t start, size;
> > +
> > +       if (!nr_pages)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       start = PFN_PHYS(pfn);
> > +       size = PFN_PHYS(min(nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION
> > +                               - (pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK)));
> > +       size = ALIGN(size, SECTION_ACTIVE_SIZE);
> > +
> > +       idx_start = section_active_index(start);
> > +       idx_size = section_active_index(size);
> > +
> > +       if (idx_size == 0)
> > +               return -1;
> > +       return ((1UL << idx_size) - 1) << idx_start;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void section_active_init(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> > +{
> > +       int end_sec = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn + nr_pages - 1);
> > +       int i, start_sec = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
> > +
> > +       if (!nr_pages)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       for (i = start_sec; i <= end_sec; i++) {
> > +               struct mem_section *ms;
> > +               unsigned long mask;
> > +               unsigned long pfns;
> > +
> > +               pfns = min(nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION
> > +                               - (pfn & ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK));
> > +               mask = section_active_mask(pfn, pfns);
> > +
> > +               ms = __nr_to_section(i);
> > +               pr_debug("%s: sec: %d mask: %#018lx\n", __func__, i, mask);
> > +               ms->usage->map_active = mask;
> > +
> > +               pfn += pfns;
> > +               nr_pages -= pfns;
> > +       }
> > +}
>
> For some reasons the above code is confusing to me. It seems all the
> code supposed to do is set all map_active to -1, and trim the first
> and last sections (can be the same section of course). So, I would
> replace the above two functions with one function like this:
>
> void section_active_init(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
>         int end_sec = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn + nr_pages - 1);
>         int i, idx, start_sec = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>         struct mem_section *ms;
>
>         if (!nr_pages)
>                 return;
>
>         for (i = start_sec; i <= end_sec; i++) {
>                 ms = __nr_to_section(i);
>                 ms->usage->map_active = ~0ul;
>         }
>
>         /* Might need to trim active pfns from the beginning and end */
>         idx = section_active_index(PFN_PHYS(pfn));
>         ms = __nr_to_section(start_sec);
>         ms->usage->map_active &= (~0ul << idx);
>
>         idx = section_active_index(PFN_PHYS(pfn + nr_pages -1));
>         ms = __nr_to_section(end_sec);
>         ms->usage->map_active &= (~0ul >> (BITS_PER_LONG - idx - 1));
> }

I like the cleanup, but one of the fixes in v7 resulted in the
realization that a given section may be populated twice at init time.
For example, enabling that pr_debug() yields:

    section_active_init: sec: 12 mask: 0x00000003ffffffff
    section_active_init: sec: 12 mask: 0xe000000000000000

So, the implementation can't blindly clear bits based on the current
parameters. However, I'm switching this code over to use bitmap_*()
helpers which should help with the readability.


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-04 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 18:38 [PATCH v6 00/12] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce struct mem_section_usage Dan Williams
2019-05-01 23:25   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02  6:07     ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02 14:16       ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-04  0:22       ` Dan Williams
2019-05-04 15:55         ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] mm/sparsemem: Introduce common definitions for the size and mask of a section Dan Williams
2019-05-02 14:53   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-03  0:41     ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03 10:35       ` Robin Murphy
2019-05-03 12:57         ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-03 13:00           ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] mm/sparsemem: Add helpers track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2019-04-25 14:43   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-26 12:57   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02 16:12   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-04 19:26     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-05-04 19:40       ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] mm/hotplug: Prepare shrink_{zone, pgdat}_span for sub-section removal Dan Williams
2019-04-19 23:09   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-04-19 23:13     ` Dan Williams
2019-04-26 13:59   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-26 14:00     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02 19:18   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] mm/sparsemem: Convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2019-05-02 19:28   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] mm/hotplug: Add mem-hotplug restrictions for remove_memory() Dan Williams
2019-04-23 21:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-24 18:07     ` Dan Williams
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] mm: Kill is_dev_zone() helper Dan Williams
2019-04-17 20:17   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-04-26 14:04   ` Oscar Salvador
2019-05-02 20:37   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] mm/sparsemem: Prepare for sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2019-05-02 21:25   ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] mm/sparsemem: Support sub-section hotplug Dan Williams
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] mm/devm_memremap_pages: Enable sub-section remap Dan Williams
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Fix fsdax-mode namespace info-block zero-fields Dan Williams
2019-04-17 22:02   ` Andrew Morton
2019-04-17 22:09     ` Dan Williams
2019-04-17 18:39 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] libnvdimm/pfn: Stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment Dan Williams
2019-04-17 22:03 ` [PATCH v6 00/12] mm: Sub-section memory hotplug support Andrew Morton
2019-04-17 22:59   ` Dan Williams
2019-04-18  2:09     ` Dan Williams
2019-04-18 12:45       ` Jeff Moyer
2019-04-19  3:25         ` Dan Williams
2019-04-23 13:16     ` Oscar Salvador
2019-04-24 20:43       ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 22:46 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 23:20   ` Dan Williams
2019-05-02 23:21     ` Dan Williams
2019-05-03 10:48     ` Oscar Salvador

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPcyv4hH2733FEs4bAroa4zscM_PkshEWEmRw7LwXwVJb9pDWg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).