From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm: memcontrol: switch to rstat
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:07:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCFFvdd7CgE+GWEQ@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YB1zi/bZdeL2j59I@cmpxchg.org>
On Fri 05-02-21 11:34:19, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:05:20PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 02-02-21 13:47:45, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Replace the memory controller's custom hierarchical stats code with
> > > the generic rstat infrastructure provided by the cgroup core.
> > >
> > > The current implementation does batched upward propagation from the
> > > write side (i.e. as stats change). The per-cpu batches introduce an
> > > error, which is multiplied by the number of subgroups in a tree. In
> > > systems with many CPUs and sizable cgroup trees, the error can be
> > > large enough to confuse users (e.g. 32 batch pages * 32 CPUs * 32
> > > subgroups results in an error of up to 128M per stat item). This can
> > > entirely swallow allocation bursts inside a workload that the user is
> > > expecting to see reflected in the statistics.
> > >
> > > In the past, we've done read-side aggregation, where a memory.stat
> > > read would have to walk the entire subtree and add up per-cpu
> > > counts. This became problematic with lazily-freed cgroups: we could
> > > have large subtrees where most cgroups were entirely idle. Hence the
> > > switch to change-driven upward propagation. Unfortunately, it needed
> > > to trade accuracy for speed due to the write side being so hot.
> > >
> > > Rstat combines the best of both worlds: from the write side, it
> > > cheaply maintains a queue of cgroups that have pending changes, so
> > > that the read side can do selective tree aggregation. This way the
> > > reported stats will always be precise and recent as can be, while the
> > > aggregation can skip over potentially large numbers of idle cgroups.
> > >
> > > This adds a second vmstats to struct mem_cgroup (MEMCG_NR_STAT +
> > > NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS) to track pending subtree deltas during upward
> > > aggregation. It removes 3 words from the per-cpu data. It eliminates
> > > memcg_exact_page_state(), since memcg_page_state() is now exact.
> >
> > The above confused me a bit. I can see the pcp data size increased by
> > adding _prev. The resulting memory footprint should be increased by
> > sizeof(long) * (MEMCG_NR_STAT + NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS) * (CPUS + 1)
> > which is roughly 1kB per CPU per memcg unless I have made any
> > mistake. This is a quite a lot and it should be mentioned in the
> > changelog.
>
> Not quite, you missed a hunk further below in the patch.
You are right.
> Yes, the _prev arrays are added to the percpu struct. HOWEVER, we used
> to have TWO percpu structs in a memcg: one for local data, one for
> hierarchical data. In the rstat format, one is enough to capture both:
>
> - /* Legacy local VM stats and events */
> - struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_local;
> -
> - /* Subtree VM stats and events (batched updates) */
> struct memcg_vmstats_percpu __percpu *vmstats_percpu;
>
> This eliminates dead duplicates of the nr_page_events and
> targets[MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS(2)] we used to carry, which means we have
> a net reduction of 3 longs in the percpu data with this series.
In the old code we used to have
2*(MEMCG_NR_STAT + NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS + MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS) (2 struct
memcg_vmstats_percpu) pcp data plus MEMCG_NR_STAT + NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS
atomics.
New code has 2*MEMCG_NR_STAT + 2*NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS + MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS
in pcp plus 2*MEMCG_NR_STAT + 2*NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS aggregated
counters.
So the resulting diff is MEMCG_NR_STAT + NR_VM_EVENT_ITEMS - MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS * nr_cpus
which would be 1024 - 2 * nr_cpus. Which looks better.
Thanks and sorry for misreading the patch.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-02 18:47 [PATCH 0/7]: mm: memcontrol: switch to rstat Johannes Weiner
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: memcontrol: fix cpuhotplug statistics flushing Johannes Weiner
2021-02-02 22:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-02 23:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-03 2:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 19:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 19:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-05 17:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 13:28 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: memcontrol: kill mem_cgroup_nodeinfo() Johannes Weiner
2021-02-02 22:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-02 23:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 13:29 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: memcontrol: privatize memcg_page_state query functions Johannes Weiner
2021-02-02 22:26 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-02-02 23:17 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] cgroup: rstat: support cgroup1 Johannes Weiner
2021-02-03 1:16 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 13:39 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-04 16:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 16:42 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] cgroup: rstat: punt root-level optimization to individual controllers Johannes Weiner
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: memcontrol: switch to rstat Johannes Weiner
2021-02-03 1:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 16:26 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 18:45 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 20:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 14:19 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-04 16:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 16:44 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-04 20:28 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-05 15:05 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-05 16:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-08 14:07 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-02-02 18:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: memcontrol: consolidate lruvec stat flushing Johannes Weiner
2021-02-03 2:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-04 21:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2021-02-04 21:47 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-02-05 15:17 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-05 17:10 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YCFFvdd7CgE+GWEQ@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).