From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F248C433DB for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CBB651FC for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:49:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 87CBB651FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 72F8F8D002A; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 6B7F88D001D; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 531D78D002A; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0119.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.119]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A068D001D for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 07:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF54B8249980 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:49:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77896687386.19.18B4378 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413FBC0007C4 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:49:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1615207752; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I3MA4O9DPW7El1WvYUSmQ4/nQjjkpDOwqQCrp1Pj6HE=; b=r9PKsI+ds0ZUgOainH1rJRz753YW+3pgUswiqXlZU6WuyUF/tz9RrM7Fbqdv3kreUXNfZK rFySYes+vasGUysSslddJeY+oFcyHLOim7Y18mRDUAEwwd0mSZkfPys2wXFp9lrBZ0p5AG Wu9hBRt+9I78DaBoELb7hG8e0C2Fz/g= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEC4AC0C; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 12:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:49:11 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Minchan Kim Cc: David Hildenbrand , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , joaodias@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: be more verbose for alloc_contig_range faliures Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 413FBC0007C4 X-Stat-Signature: t6sx1mibnqohwj43rc665rcb9ptnau1f Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf06; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1615207753-111204 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 04-03-21 10:22:51, Minchan Kim wrote: [...] > How about this? > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index 238d0fc232aa..489e557b9390 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -8481,7 +8481,8 @@ static inline void dump_migrate_failure_pages(struct list_head *page_list) > > /* [start, end) must belong to a single zone. */ > static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc, > - unsigned long start, unsigned long end) > + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, > + bool nofail) This sounds like a very bad idea to me. Your nofail definition might differ from what we actually define as __GFP_NOFAIL but I do not think this interface should ever promise anything that strong. Sure movable, cma regions should effectively never fail but there will never be any _guarantee_ for that. Earlier in the discussion I have suggested dynamic debugging facility. Documentation/admin-guide/dynamic-debug-howto.rst. Have you tried to look into that direction? > { > /* This function is based on compact_zone() from compaction.c. */ > unsigned int nr_reclaimed; > @@ -8522,7 +8523,8 @@ static int __alloc_contig_migrate_range(struct compact_control *cc, > NULL, (unsigned long)&mtc, cc->mode, MR_CONTIG_RANGE); > } > if (ret < 0) { > - dump_migrate_failure_pages(&cc->migratepages); > + if (ret == -EBUSY && nofail) > + dump_migrate_failure_pages(&cc->migratepages); > putback_movable_pages(&cc->migratepages); > return ret; > } > @@ -8610,7 +8612,9 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, > * allocated. So, if we fall through be sure to clear ret so that > * -EBUSY is not accidentally used or returned to caller. > */ > - ret = __alloc_contig_migrate_range(&cc, start, end); > + ret = __alloc_contig_migrate_range(&cc, start, end, > + migratetype == CMA || > + zone_idx(cc.zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE); > if (ret && ret != -EBUSY) > goto done; > ret =0; -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs