From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8EFC433C1 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237096194A for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 237096194A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B79E68D0003; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:39:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B2A448D0001; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:39:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9CB808D0003; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:39:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0019.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8183D8D0001 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:39:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AECA9895 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:39:17 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77937032754.06.8DBD8A2 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7877BC0201E4 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1616167625; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NnKWTvIsJonhFgfg0n8WV19i2rpTuNx8CHDjSLQe+xA=; b=CaRC4s3xWRgWNvyTXzxeXkBUSXd4SbcUvW0KA78+qCNpRXru8FGWrFVdbCUaaXHQ1Il2Yt t7DMcOlgl9/fkQpz7Val/eCnMgckK9poPEItgV1bvQ8x7oX3kMSRkTpdPGeAWjsGnAGFOy UtuWwKSrCWjmSMCGMKFXJ3xlVd8xVXk= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F19AC17; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 15:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:27:03 +0100 From: Petr Mladek To: Yafang Shao Cc: willy@infradead.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, david@redhat.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, vbabka@suse.cz, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, joe@perches.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkp@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 resend 3/3] vsprintf: dump full information of page flags in pGp Message-ID: References: <20210319101246.73513-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <20210319101246.73513-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210319101246.73513-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7877BC0201E4 X-Stat-Signature: syga5tzdyc4xb7jk6bsh13z9tewqwryj Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf06; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616167631-323486 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri 2021-03-19 18:12:46, Yafang Shao wrote: > Currently the pGp only shows the names of page flags, rather than > the full information including section, node, zone, last cpupid and > kasan tag. While it is not easy to parse these information manually > because there're so many flavors. Let's interpret them in pGp as well. > > To be compitable with the existed format of pGp, the new introduced ones > also use '|' as the separator, then the user tools parsing pGp won't > need to make change, suggested by Matthew. The new information is > tracked onto the end of the existed one. > > On example of the output in mm/slub.c as follows, > - Before the patch, > [ 6343.396602] Slab 0x000000004382e02b objects=33 used=3 fp=0x000000009ae06ffc flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head) > > - After the patch, > [ 8448.272530] Slab 0x0000000090797883 objects=33 used=3 fp=0x00000000790f1c26 flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) > > The documentation and test cases are also updated. The output of the > test cases as follows, > [68599.816764] test_printf: loaded. > [68599.819068] test_printf: all 388 tests passed > [68599.830367] test_printf: unloaded. > > [lkp@intel.com: reported issues in the prev version in test_printf.c] > > Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek It looks good. And it seems that the selftest should not longer have that problems on various architectures and configurations. I am going to push it. Best Regards, Petr