From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DC2C433DB for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EE361A27 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:11:53 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 66EE361A27 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C80406B0070; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:11:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C56DA6B0071; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:11:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B1EE66B0072; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:11:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0104.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.104]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979846B0070 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 06:11:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin39.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF77183CEEF2 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:11:52 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77957980464.39.F9048D1 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061A7600010B for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:11:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1616667110; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EIkHbXDb/i6xPkCAyF4U442rC/hx9VdhrbGtj9pOovw=; b=bX08Ly5d3CTlSBvappvx3WnH2vIhXx8+VKqLDsXv0j11VvUQGi34G+YZZNdkUV0yDmiNDh dIWdD0DCloytTFa/bvdDYORvyd6Enc/pNsylxggNUa9xaFppbcmB3dWA2OCduG/W7zu/Gs apfdGtV8zGXGOM/A97NqQfeD7OjQjdM= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D42AC16; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 11:11:49 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Muchun Song , David Rientjes , Miaohe Lin , Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Wilcox , HORIGUCHI NAOYA , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Waiman Long , Peter Xu , Mina Almasry , Hillf Danton , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm: cma: introduce cma_release_nowait() Message-ID: References: <20210325002835.216118-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <20210325002835.216118-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Stat-Signature: ptbjomnfspou4e5omma9qgbre864kcs8 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 061A7600010B Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf09; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616667110-731971 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 25-03-21 10:45:19, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 24-03-21 17:28:28, Mike Kravetz wrote: > [...] > > phys_addr_t cma_get_base(const struct cma *cma) > > { > > return PFN_PHYS(cma->base_pfn); > > @@ -146,6 +155,10 @@ static int __init cma_init_reserved_areas(void) > > for (i = 0; i < cma_area_count; i++) > > cma_activate_area(&cma_areas[i]); > > > > + cma_release_wq = create_workqueue("cma_release"); > > Considering the workqueue is used to free up memory it should likely be > WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to prevent from long stalls when WQs are overloaded. > > I cannot judge the CMA parts from a very quick glance this looks > reasonably. I have overlooked that +static void cma_clear_bitmap_fn(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct cma_clear_bitmap_work *w; + + w = container_of(work, struct cma_clear_bitmap_work, work); + + cma_clear_bitmap(w->cma, w->pfn, w->count); + + __free_page(pfn_to_page(w->pfn)); +} should be doing free_contig_range with w->count target. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs