From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9E8C433ED for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EC2610CF for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:13:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 85EC2610CF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mit.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1E2566B00B5; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 192B06B00B7; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 05A076B00B8; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0084.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.84]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2416B00B5 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E56218025C01 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:13:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77984898684.05.6E17B7D Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA30A00038D for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cwcc.thunk.org (pool-72-74-133-215.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.74.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 131KDLnN028880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:22 -0400 Received: by cwcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id B235F15C3A90; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:13:21 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Al Viro Cc: Roy Yang , keescook@chromium.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alex.popov@linux.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, corbet@lwn.net, david@redhat.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com, glider@google.com, jannh@google.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, luto@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, vbabka@suse.cz, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Where we are for this patch? Message-ID: References: <20210330205750.428816-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20210401191744.1685896-1-royyang@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ECA30A00038D X-Stat-Signature: netj38ps46w911fag8ppjg3fk1pmit6s Received-SPF: none (mit.edu>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf07; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=outgoing.mit.edu; client-ip=18.9.28.11 X-HE-DKIM-Result: none/none X-HE-Tag: 1617308021-580115 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:30PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:17:44PM -0700, Roy Yang wrote: > > Both Android and Chrome OS really want this feature; For Container-Optimized OS, we have customers > > interested in the defense too. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Change-Id: I1eb1b726007aa8f9c374b934cc1c690fb4924aa3 > > You forgot to tell what patch you are refering to. Your > Change-Id (whatever the hell that is) doesn't help at all. Don't > assume that keys in your internal database make sense for the > rest of the world, especially when they appear to contain a hash > of something... The Change-Id fails to have any direct search hits at lore.kernel.org. However, it turn up Roy's original patch, and clicking on the message-Id in the "In-Reply-Field", it apperas Roy was replying to this message: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210330205750.428816-1-keescook@chromium.org/ which is the head of this patch series: Subject: [PATCH v8 0/6] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall That being said, it would have been better if the original subject line had been preserved, and it's yet another example of how the lore.kernel.org URL is infinitely better than the Change-Id. :-) - Ted