From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] percpu: factor out pcpu_check_chunk_hint()
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:15:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHn+beQ8QRpm8WqU@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210408035736.883861-6-guro@fb.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 08:57:35PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Factor out the pcpu_check_chunk_hint() helper, which will be useful
> in the future. The new function checks if the allocation can likely
> fit the given chunk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> ---
> mm/percpu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> index e20119668c42..357fd6994278 100644
> --- a/mm/percpu.c
> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,26 @@ static unsigned long pcpu_block_off_to_off(int index, int off)
> return index * PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS + off;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * pcpu_check_chunk_hint - check that allocation can fit a chunk
> + * @chunk_md: chunk's block
nit for consistency: @block: block of interest
> + * @bits: size of request in allocation units
> + * @align: alignment of area (max PAGE_SIZE)
> + *
> + * Check to see if the allocation can fit in the chunk's contig hint.
> + * This is an optimization to prevent scanning by assuming if it
> + * cannot fit in the global hint, there is memory pressure and creating
> + * a new chunk would happen soon.
> + */
It occurred to me, That I converged block_md and chunk_md to be the same
object as 1 is just a degenerative case of the other. Can we rename this
to be pcpu_check_block_hint() and have it take in pcpu_block_md?
> +static bool pcpu_check_chunk_hint(struct pcpu_block_md *chunk_md, int bits,
> + size_t align)
> +{
> + int bit_off = ALIGN(chunk_md->contig_hint_start, align) -
> + chunk_md->contig_hint_start;
> +
> + return bit_off + bits <= chunk_md->contig_hint;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * pcpu_next_hint - determine which hint to use
> * @block: block of interest
> @@ -1065,15 +1085,7 @@ static int pcpu_find_block_fit(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int alloc_bits,
> struct pcpu_block_md *chunk_md = &chunk->chunk_md;
> int bit_off, bits, next_off;
>
> - /*
> - * Check to see if the allocation can fit in the chunk's contig hint.
> - * This is an optimization to prevent scanning by assuming if it
> - * cannot fit in the global hint, there is memory pressure and creating
> - * a new chunk would happen soon.
> - */
> - bit_off = ALIGN(chunk_md->contig_hint_start, align) -
> - chunk_md->contig_hint_start;
> - if (bit_off + alloc_bits > chunk_md->contig_hint)
> + if (!pcpu_check_chunk_hint(chunk_md, alloc_bits, align))
> return -1;
>
> bit_off = pcpu_next_hint(chunk_md, alloc_bits);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Thanks,
Dennis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-08 3:57 [PATCH v3 0/6] percpu: partial chunk depopulation Roman Gushchin
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] percpu: fix a comment about the chunks ordering Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 21:06 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] percpu: split __pcpu_balance_workfn() Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 21:06 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] percpu: make pcpu_nr_empty_pop_pages per chunk type Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 21:08 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] percpu: generalize pcpu_balance_populated() Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 21:09 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] percpu: factor out pcpu_check_chunk_hint() Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 21:15 ` Dennis Zhou [this message]
2021-04-08 3:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] percpu: implement partial chunk depopulation Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 12:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] percpu: " Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 14:18 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-16 15:28 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 17:13 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 18:27 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 18:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 18:41 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 19:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-16 19:44 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 20:03 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-04-17 7:08 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 21:47 ` Dennis Zhou
2021-04-17 7:14 ` Pratik Sampat
2021-04-16 16:21 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YHn+beQ8QRpm8WqU@google.com \
--to=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).