From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E6BC07E9E for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D201161CE8 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:50:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D201161CE8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8EF2A6B0011; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:50:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 89F5F6B005D; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:50:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6F1416B006C; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:50:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0156.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.156]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BE16B0011 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 04:50:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F1A80FE999 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:50:29 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78338799378.17.1E874E8 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08886001BB4 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:50:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1625734228; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SuIb8Mf/UTnaQz6OhnBGLu2JATZoHpFDaa87yUrmOjI=; b=WciHVvd6PqtFtrlpZOQ6sCB/jPcbkKor8HlxKlY0ZJ8L7tp1UD4lMOR8oxeblkaw9YXVF3 5DPjUwl1sm+kCG3KFNWYYBwbuPMGQpzdYJvBwGQXoGUchALjtHtGB8repPElIBpMVUof4N DZ3V60V7NjseMwJETgTedDzZqiW+Iqs= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-100-WKnRU8nNN22BKcq_0LYQHg-1; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 04:50:27 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WKnRU8nNN22BKcq_0LYQHg-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id f16-20020a1c6a100000b0290210c73f067aso881243wmc.6 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SuIb8Mf/UTnaQz6OhnBGLu2JATZoHpFDaa87yUrmOjI=; b=rqnOMaquw53c9Cuc7mKvQXBFVZPjDuRD1JThtLPkOysMPsrf03dcEW9efq4GD98G0s wso1MOaQ8IleRbWMyXDE9+X0alwIi3FFwf+cvQjLBPGqKQJ4NXt1b+I7VLP9yPSABm7C vj+fgJP/Pc1tM69yjeflXC2q4FBZCqOGHtBChXdyVFrU48GP5HIkMoTBmLxqA1ZqybJS VWR6rBmHvjw1cCfb0gOczZd8CvJW+umVCQBA2itV31sOrn1YJS4jFPDFcKCLkkejZemy Ki2WQtg6XRUjEVjxf+dKvDb7C+Z6YNbQ2UxiTE0stcG8KIlCrfRVusjyz2SlTxCRjVm9 SqGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Lr72f0IX8XwpxFa+1zTTmtx/dz3Jw74h/nuUICNXORag7PsY3 KxYnUtjoBamhp+4CmUTnOsuVBiXHQM3mIHvG40oApUze6SqZEgnJ6d0RChtuJsJQR8Y45zyls44 sqtk5okOsURg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c1d:: with SMTP id j29mr32350637wms.34.1625734225954; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMxAdEuD7qHb5c0k9Wf7jG75F3PvDQ5XFmRSVxx0RNY6c6tA03nnyEHlmbWdrGaWp7vAZumw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c1d:: with SMTP id j29mr32350583wms.34.1625734225686; Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work-vm (cpc109021-salf6-2-0-cust453.10-2.cable.virginm.net. [82.29.237.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o3sm1529999wrw.56.2021.07.08.01.50.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 08 Jul 2021 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 09:50:22 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Tom Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Sergio Lopez , Peter Gonda , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , David Rientjes , Dov Murik , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Borislav Petkov , Michael Roth , Vlastimil Babka , tony.luck@intel.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 04/36] x86/mm: Add sev_feature_enabled() helper Message-ID: References: <20210707181506.30489-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210707181506.30489-5-brijesh.singh@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210707181506.30489-5-brijesh.singh@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.7 (2021-05-04) X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WciHVvd6; spf=none (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of dgilbert@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.133.124) smtp.mailfrom=dgilbert@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Stat-Signature: u7rnmgk57osfx6japnsm67jf7ehu85jk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B08886001BB4 X-Rspam-User: nil X-HE-Tag: 1625734228-958723 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: * Brijesh Singh (brijesh.singh@amd.com) wrote: > The sev_feature_enabled() helper can be used by the guest to query whether > the SNP - Secure Nested Paging feature is active. > > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h | 8 ++++++++ > arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 2 ++ > arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > index 8cc2fd308f65..fb857f2e72cb 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_encrypt.h > @@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ > > #include > > +enum sev_feature_type { > + SEV, > + SEV_ES, > + SEV_SNP > +}; Is this .... > #ifdef CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT > > extern u64 sme_me_mask; > @@ -54,6 +60,7 @@ void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void); > bool sme_active(void); > bool sev_active(void); > bool sev_es_active(void); > +bool sev_feature_enabled(unsigned int feature_type); > > #define __bss_decrypted __section(".bss..decrypted") > > @@ -87,6 +94,7 @@ static inline int __init > early_set_memory_encrypted(unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long size) { return 0; } > > static inline void mem_encrypt_free_decrypted_mem(void) { } > +static bool sev_feature_enabled(unsigned int feature_type) { return false; } > > #define __bss_decrypted > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > index a7c413432b33..37589da0282e 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > @@ -481,8 +481,10 @@ > #define MSR_AMD64_SEV 0xc0010131 > #define MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED_BIT 0 > #define MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED_BIT 1 > +#define MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED_BIT 2 Just the same as this ? > #define MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED_BIT) > #define MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED_BIT) > +#define MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED BIT_ULL(MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED_BIT) > > #define MSR_AMD64_VIRT_SPEC_CTRL 0xc001011f > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c > index ff08dc463634..63e7799a9a86 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c > @@ -389,6 +389,16 @@ bool noinstr sev_es_active(void) > return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED; > } > > +bool sev_feature_enabled(unsigned int type) In which case, if you want the enum then that would be enum sev_feature_type type ? > +{ > + switch (type) { > + case SEV: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED; > + case SEV_ES: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED; > + case SEV_SNP: return sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED; > + default: return false; or, could you just go for making that whole thing a bit test on 1< + } > +} > + > /* Override for DMA direct allocation check - ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED */ > bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev) > { > @@ -461,6 +471,10 @@ static void print_mem_encrypt_feature_info(void) > if (sev_es_active()) > pr_cont(" SEV-ES"); > > + /* Secure Nested Paging */ > + if (sev_feature_enabled(SEV_SNP)) > + pr_cont(" SEV-SNP"); > + > pr_cont("\n"); > } Dave > -- > 2.17.1 > > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK