From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB506C07E96 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FD7613BC for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:16:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 66FD7613BC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5C82E8D00B0; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:16:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 59E708D0065; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:16:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 466BA8D00B0; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:16:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0213.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.213]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256378D0065 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:16:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E781AEC6 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:16:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78364569402.13.1CA71A5 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf17.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A42F0003B2 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:16:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jHHWPYXI8/YaTeNgH04Z3Eb0UrI7Jdot4WJDAmytkTs=; b=pb4vsdRNxJnvLKou11FGvbxXeN Y791P5KQeZzLgfkDApxMhnktEXTA1gf/umPWs0kRDwS/lq+rLpUg0ASEH7UI+/hJNpaaCS22tJqcJ mWhXfX7bDiXhBykW3cx6pOqxg1tDlkoiUvXwYqYDGHOfhIdklGcKyiuuiBkFAVD98sP8EuJSh/Sn2 gxmnfabphkpO/5YVgJg3C4NzL7C7km6lAynR1KUcV+f8MWq3NtI+mGoVzFD+sy6FBwSzZR408Wy15 GVtQ1ringKFzfE/1a7T1MsNMZIoP+vupUl03b377JV891BMdTKL5YmMY2PktOIHkjs4h6Jq9lOkYY CIK12kJg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m3zLC-003HTE-8l; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:15:54 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:15:42 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: kernel test robot Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka , William Kucharski , Christoph Hellwig , "Kirill A . Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 031/138] fs/netfs: Add folio fscache functions Message-ID: References: <20210715033704.692967-32-willy@infradead.org> <202107151736.FcPr80d7-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202107151736.FcPr80d7-lkp@intel.com> Authentication-Results: imf17.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=pb4vsdRN; spf=none (imf17.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 12A42F0003B2 X-Stat-Signature: 74yokue79ms6t9oc4yaz1ot4ndmw5utr X-HE-Tag: 1626347800-751520 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:51:26PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > include/linux/netfs.h: In function 'folio_start_fscache': > >> include/linux/netfs.h:43:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_set_private_2_flag'; did you mean 'folio_set_private_2'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 43 | folio_set_private_2_flag(folio); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | folio_set_private_2 > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors I'll be folding in this patch: +++ b/include/linux/netfs.h @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static inline void folio_start_fscache(struct folio *folio) { VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_private_2(folio), folio); folio_get(folio); - folio_set_private_2_flag(folio); + folio_set_private_2(folio); } /**