From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Make MAX_ORDER adjustable as a kernel boot time parameter.
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 22:23:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQ75wVUXPO6yRx7T@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQ3dn1oR2d0sO5jl@casper.infradead.org>
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 02:10:55AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> This hasn't been helped by the scarce number of 1GB TLB entries in Intel
> CPUs until very recently (and even those are hard to come by today).
Minor correction to this. I just fixed x86info to work on my Core
i7-1165G7 (Tiger Lake, launched about a year ago) and discovered it has:
L1 Store Only TLB: 1GB/4MB/2MB/4KB pages, fully associative, 16 entries
L1 Load Only TLB: 1GB pages, fully associative, 8 entries
L2 Unified TLB: 1GB/4KB pages, 8-way associative, 1024 entries
My prior laptop (i7-7500U, Kaby Lake, 2016) has only 4x 1GB TLB entries at
the L1 level, and no support for L2 1GB pages. So this speaks to Intel
finally taking performance of 1GB TLB entries seriously. Perhaps more
seriously than they need to for a laptop with 16GB of memory! There are
Xeon-W versions of this CPU, so I imagine that there are versions which
can support 1TB or more memory.
I still think that 1GB pages are too big for anything but specialist
use cases, but those do exist.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-07 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 19:02 [RFC PATCH 00/15] Make MAX_ORDER adjustable as a kernel boot time parameter Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 01/15] arch: x86: remove MAX_ORDER exceeding SECTION_SIZE check for 32bit vdso Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 02/15] arch: mm: rename FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER to ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 03/15] mm: check pfn validity when buddy allocator can merge pages across mem sections Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 04/15] mm: prevent pageblock size being larger than section size Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 05/15] mm/memory_hotplug: online pages at " Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 06/15] mm: use PAGES_PER_SECTION instead for mem_map_offset/next() Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 07/15] mm: hugetlb: use PAGES_PER_SECTION to check mem_map discontiguity Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] fs: proc: use PAGES_PER_SECTION for page offline checking period Zi Yan
2021-08-07 10:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-09 15:45 ` [RFC PATCH 08/15] " Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 09/15] virtio: virtio_mem: use PAGES_PER_SECTION instead of MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES Zi Yan
2021-08-09 7:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 10/15] virtio: virtio_balloon: " Zi Yan
2021-08-09 7:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 11/15] mm/page_reporting: report pages at section size instead of MAX_ORDER Zi Yan
2021-08-09 7:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-09 14:12 ` Alexander Duyck
2021-08-09 15:08 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-09 16:51 ` Alexander Duyck
2021-08-09 14:08 ` Alexander Duyck
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 12/15] mm: Make MAX_ORDER of buddy allocator configurable via Kconfig SET_MAX_ORDER Zi Yan
2021-08-06 15:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-08-06 15:23 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 13/15] mm: convert MAX_ORDER sized static arrays to dynamic ones Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:16 ` Christian König
2021-08-05 19:58 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-06 9:37 ` Christian König
2021-08-06 14:00 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 14/15] mm: introduce MIN_MAX_ORDER to replace MAX_ORDER as compile time constant Zi Yan
2021-08-08 8:23 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-09 15:35 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-05 19:02 ` [RFC PATCH 15/15] mm: make MAX_ORDER a kernel boot time parameter Zi Yan
2021-08-06 15:36 ` [RFC PATCH 00/15] Make MAX_ORDER adjustable as " Vlastimil Babka
2021-08-06 16:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 16:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-08-06 17:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-06 18:24 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-09 7:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-08-08 7:41 ` Mike Rapoport
2021-08-06 16:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-08-06 17:19 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-06 20:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-08-06 21:26 ` Zi Yan
2021-08-09 4:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-08-07 1:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-08-07 21:23 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-08-09 4:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-08-09 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-08-09 7:41 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQ75wVUXPO6yRx7T@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).