From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Yongmei Xie <yongmeixie@hotmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm:vmscan: fix extra adjustment for lruvec's nonresident_age in case of reactivation
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 10:48:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUnwsyE87TViMNMz@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYCP286MB1108D012DA436CA72029ACA7C5DF9@TYCP286MB1108.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:25:09PM +0800, Yongmei Xie wrote:
> Before commit #31d8fcac, VM didn't increase nonresident_age (AKA inactive age for
> file pages) in shrink_page_list. When putback_inactive_pages was converged with
> move_pages_to_lru, both shrink_active_list and shrink_page_list use the same
> function to handle move pages to the appropriate lru under lru lock's protection.
>
> At those day, VM didn't increase nonresident_age for second chance promotion.
> Commit #31d8fcac fix the problem. Definitely, we should account the activation
> for second chance. But move_pages_to_lru is used in reactivation in active lru
> as well for protecting code section. So I suggest to add another variable to
> tell whether reactivation or not.
This looks incorrect to me. We *should* count reactivations/rotations
on the active list toward nonresident age.
The nonresident age tracks the number of in-memory references in order
to later calculate the (minimum) reuse distance of refaulting pages.
If a page on the active list gets reactivated due to a reference, that
reference contributes to the distance of yet-to-refault pages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-19 15:25 [PATCH] mm:vmscan: fix extra adjustment for lruvec's nonresident_age in case of reactivation Yongmei Xie
2021-09-20 3:11 ` 回复: " 解 咏梅
2021-09-21 14:48 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
[not found] ` <TYYP286MB11150330E283CC23CB16E40CC5A29@TYYP286MB1115.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2021-10-01 16:43 ` Johannes Weiner
[not found] ` <TYYP286MB1115E3D67A88FFF1BFB68996C5B19@TYYP286MB1115.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2021-10-07 16:34 ` 回复: " Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUnwsyE87TViMNMz@cmpxchg.org \
--to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=yongmeixie@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).