linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT  memory policy
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:48:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWa5geHLIPe2aUxB@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWa4FoicH0VztGTl@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed 13-10-21 12:42:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [Cc linux-api]
> 
> On Wed 13-10-21 15:15:39, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > This mempolicy mode can be used with either the set_mempolicy(2)
> > or mbind(2) interfaces.  Like the MPOL_PREFERRED interface, it
> > allows an application to set a preference node from which the kernel
> > will fulfill memory allocation requests. Unlike the MPOL_PREFERRED mode,
> > it takes a set of nodes. The nodes in the nodemask are used as fallback
> > allocation nodes if memory is not available on the preferred node.
> > Unlike MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY, it will not fall back memory allocations
> > to all nodes in the system. Like the MPOL_BIND interface, it works over a
> > set of nodes and will cause a SIGSEGV or invoke the OOM killer if
> > memory is not available on those preferred nodes.
> > 
> > This patch helps applications to hint a memory allocation preference node
> > and fallback to _only_ a set of nodes if the memory is not available
> > on the preferred node.  Fallback allocation is attempted from the node which is
> > nearest to the preferred node.
> > 
> > This new memory policy helps applications to have explicit control on slow
> > memory allocation and avoids default fallback to slow memory NUMA nodes.
> > The difference with MPOL_BIND is the ability to specify a preferred node
> > which is the first node in the nodemask argument passed.

I am sorry but I do not understand the semantic diffrence from
MPOL_BIND. Could you be more specific please?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13  9:45 [RFC PATCH] mm/mempolicy: add MPOL_PREFERRED_STRICT memory policy Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 10:42 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 10:48   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-10-13 12:35     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 12:50       ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 12:58         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 13:07           ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:10             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:22               ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:57           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:26             ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-13 13:16 ` Andi Kleen
2021-10-13 13:23   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-13 14:21     ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14  9:30       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14  9:38         ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 10:28           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14 11:41             ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 13:29               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-14 14:56                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-10-14 15:50                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2021-10-19  9:38                     ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWa5geHLIPe2aUxB@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).