From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EF0C433F5 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7E86F6B0071; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7987E6B0072; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:25:54 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6872A6B0073; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:25:54 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0231.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.231]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559146B0071 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 07:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin16.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C798249980 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:25:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79075988628.16.70519B9 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3202100009 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:25:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ahwv7/f/d1wI1UunAeceetp1H08EJfVU7XPnkABFG5E=; b=QkAOsFVIQVeugYoeLMuS21eVwD BPmC8JFQCcJ4j9NVkMK1OFcsyWA3Tkm7FFOi7HuM1PBggbDhWMqIKRzHGyjCY1XeIJ5Iy5RrzrI1W nDbb/gk7KRI4ZfAgC7LSPOJHCcuYP/4JXeOwWFiQRi2/JadQN+LF3j7bKnm03Y5i2ZaV9zUcRsPk5 VtmR2g5tvIR7Tbzm68LEAo6JfUfrL1uLEHuooRYgj8TfV+iqaJwFmHurvZhTvPwDLOPhURFH4K6ut x5MDR++uZsIdyI3fliKhXwUvc3cFDlYxI6JBO/MuLkXcAxUQKuQERqQDfdIqpSgAnvGrOsQOMHJpq GL0giNMQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nD3qN-005D5r-8h; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:25:39 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14290300268; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBFA12B52092A; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 13:25:36 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tao Zhou Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, posk@google.com, avagin@google.com, jannh@google.com, tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca, mark.rutland@arm.com, posk@posk.io Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups Message-ID: References: <20220120155517.066795336@infradead.org> <20220120160822.914418096@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A3202100009 X-Rspam-User: nil Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=QkAOsFVI; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of peterz@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=peterz@infradead.org X-Stat-Signature: b1j91cxe6mzg115sxitniz3je7jsym5x X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1643286353-503469 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:46:17PM +0800, Tao Zhou wrote: > > +/* Called from syscall exit path and exceptions that can schedule */ > > +void umcg_sys_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) > > +{ > > + struct task_struct *tsk = current; > > + long syscall = syscall_get_nr(tsk, regs); > > + > > + if (syscall == __NR_umcg_wait || > > + syscall == __NR_umcg_ctl) > > + return; > > + > > + if (tsk->umcg_server) { > > + /* > > + * Didn't block, we done. > > + */ > > + umcg_unpin_pages(); > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + umcg_unblock_and_wait(); > > umcg_unblock_and_wait() -> umcg_enqueue_and_wake() -> > umcg_wake_server() -> umcg_wake_task(tsk->umcg_server, ...) > > tsk->umcg_server is NULL here and umcg_wake_task() use it to update > state in umcg_update_state(NULL, ...), that means tsk->umcg_clock > will happen something i do not know. I think umcg_unblock_and_wait() will repin, at which point we should have tsk->umcg_server again. > There are two places to call umcg_unblock_and_wait(). One is in > umcg_register() where the server is set. Another one is in > umcg_sys_exit() where the server is not set. May use a bool to > indicate if the server is set. I'm not sure what you're on about, but I absolutely hate redundant state, that only leads to problems.