From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Huangzhaoyang <huangzhaoyang@gmail.com>,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] psi: fix possible trigger missing in the window
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:09:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgpwwZvTU/llBMeC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgpvwTbakWSI4TWK@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:05:37AM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 02:56:58PM +0800, Huangzhaoyang wrote:
> > From: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
> >
> > When a new threshold breaching stall happens after a psi event was
> > generated and within the window duration, the new event is not
> > generated because the events are rate-limited to one per window. If
> > after that no new stall is recorded then the event will not be
> > generated even after rate-limiting duration has passed. This is
> > happening because with no new stall, window_update will not be called
> > even though threshold was previously breached. To fix this, record
> > threshold breaching occurrence and generate the event once window
> > duration is passed.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com>
>
> Hey Peter, would you mind taking this through the scheduler tree? It's
> got my and Suren's acks. It's not a recent regression so I'm thinking
> for 5.18 is fine. Thanks!
Sorry, missed it, got it now. Thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 6:56 [PATCHv4] psi: fix possible trigger missing in the window Huangzhaoyang
2022-01-25 14:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-01-26 16:44 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-02-14 15:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-02-14 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgpwwZvTU/llBMeC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=huangzhaoyang@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).