From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F235C433F5 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 18:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 392A76B0073; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 319086B0075; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:54:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 1BACB6B0078; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:54:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065406B0073 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 14:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5222605F7 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 18:54:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79461620910.10.461495F Received: from out0.migadu.com (out0.migadu.com [94.23.1.103]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F711400B9 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 18:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 11:54:16 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1652468073; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WunYiDoozFlJnA00AKYmdrxduHSk2KR4s1IxWu01ZWc=; b=AkUGvY90Jenytj6a63yYuxluujbvSqSww8LlEQcAyTtBtRbjxIIxf66PW9Ho/kLc5jtzJt drtj2VBNrmFmOyBVoOFl14yrxxxMFOjvCF+s0/THk6f1LHXt5FgsMgN79qfdYRcsU380PR kUR0n2FgMwIWI+167bKGI6XfkBdyL0I= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Roman Gushchin To: Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= Cc: void@manifault.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com, tj@kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests: memcg: Expect no low events in unprotected sibling Message-ID: References: <20220512174452.tr34tuh4k5jm6qjs@dev0025.ash9.facebook.com> <20220513171811.730-1-mkoutny@suse.com> <20220513171811.730-3-mkoutny@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220513171811.730-3-mkoutny@suse.com> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: linux.dev X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 52F711400B9 X-Stat-Signature: 6cmag9f44i47jnufoguc3gp7xziku7q9 Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.s=key1 header.b=AkUGvY90; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of roman.gushchin@linux.dev designates 94.23.1.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=roman.gushchin@linux.dev X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam08 X-HE-Tag: 1652468072-771194 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 07:18:09PM +0200, Michal Koutny wrote: > This is effectively a revert of commit cdc69458a5f3 ("cgroup: account > for memory_recursiveprot in test_memcg_low()"). The case test_memcg_low > will fail with memory_recursiveprot until resolved in reclaim > code. Hm, what are our plans here? Are we going to fix it soon-ish, or there is still no agreement on how to proceed?