From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BF5C433EF for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 312446B0072; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:29:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 29A506B0083; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:29:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0EDF46B0085; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:29:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0014.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.14]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3E66B0072 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB6320452 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:29:55 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79580704350.12.C66C3C1 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com (mail-pf1-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622D540084 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id u37so3192452pfg.3 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=urXLCEo0HdMiwrT9/lHPLDvk+tFr+S8kFKoTasWYgTM=; b=jE8+1EoaVPLQAQgJuF6uSHsVQUNEYiULaZEf4qWJ+FDCtBcy5wU+1PuRU/qTw6mXuJ rhkDSC1GoM3r6gP1XqDzyFKdRxVJyQscQceF46fTmrMh4tpJ7/3OD4E0UUUL4FXaE4E4 HLsY4nWxsZ1bLbc4mtfRzI75UcR7ige6egZvCSqqgKpyeTsqtkTZjDQiW2mEf6TP1C0u 784mpZz2YhCQYjeTdJsTJu7oJeXZ7GHllZjsJApUFHo2QiJHGuFpB3Xi7l8+I0pC+m8X WUI+8LcLsPMDaqunWg8z0EiW4EPIpYE086RJe+7JyYOWlUAXkMPBTz0xEA+GhbwuK97s EpUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=urXLCEo0HdMiwrT9/lHPLDvk+tFr+S8kFKoTasWYgTM=; b=PoMy612Mc4NubIVk6TRfre6iDYAUW/BTsobmKf3f8rmV0S518f3svv8bYAka+C8lj9 MAnDAfzXmEum6Cv02RsIy4ZbL4UwLEiUE2GiWt3hCtPs97+BTNAff+V/FDbJwNO4hxbN OoA/QYLmpY4ZKKAIyg7O1MBqKMuv+171+6nxFjiVp3POfH90dCRhw9YeiHW0j5ly5zkH +vm6yHdZXgGODcjeMh/GvoYWWgTKf448TWFBoXIpECI98MZSTaNKTzgyjw32m1ZqNmR5 djZ8TCqz5TRNegYbTiDZWU08EXvnSWH5SMg1RujtK7dcTE8gp0EEj+9lFWSlq+iD+x1m 2K7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora89fh+RgSdxM3gC+WoTBvCSOVcEeyZdX/q+57/HP24KIh3kvsb+ ZEIBY5+fMjU7fDXl3B1bagFgwQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tbE6e2B2i42MyE6StE9nppc07YDmrFHDgu8iNlTHFWW5xo4NNjzQzQb9yFXGjB6QHFLP8hJw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e1c:0:b0:3fd:f319:df7b with SMTP id d28-20020a630e1c000000b003fdf319df7bmr75509pgl.135.1655303389770; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (123.65.230.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.230.65.123]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15-20020a170903018f00b0015eb200cc00sm9366660plg.138.2022.06.15.07.29.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:29:45 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Chao Peng Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Vishal Annapurve , Marc Orr , kvm list , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86 , "H . Peter Anvin" , Hugh Dickins , Jeff Layton , "J . Bruce Fields" , Andrew Morton , Mike Rapoport , Steven Price , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , Vlastimil Babka , Yu Zhang , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Jun Nakajima , Dave Hansen , Andi Kleen , David Hildenbrand , aarcange@redhat.com, ddutile@redhat.com, dhildenb@redhat.com, Quentin Perret , Michael Roth , mhocko@suse.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory Message-ID: References: <20220607065749.GA1513445@chaop.bj.intel.com> <20220608021820.GA1548172@chaop.bj.intel.com> <20220614072800.GB1783435@chaop.bj.intel.com> <20220615091759.GB1823790@chaop.bj.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220615091759.GB1823790@chaop.bj.intel.com> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655303391; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=urXLCEo0HdMiwrT9/lHPLDvk+tFr+S8kFKoTasWYgTM=; b=l+EWbV4UPOmgT6KJPnyqnUSJiWJ6k54qb0hsPW8qKqs4qxkWwyyNSTx00PKWvGet34W1/9 AQqkfLV+aOmu1Q1WXMhpErWF3ajbzQx4h67WuWWw51X3BFVzUJX77z2ndwpVSLBJot/g26 SOX3ljsxMg2mv7Ge09HR+09rH/KFcek= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=jE8+1Eoa; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of seanjc@google.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=seanjc@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655303391; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VYVcUdkDBchDddPv31v5ZkLvMIbeEW4Y9yzJz+lTsko3gSzoNMyV3tBuvpCVZRt1cmum3l IJX+KwsYSme/+xfjqpLu57k0QA4e/u2KqVwpaJcKAGcV4pFA1w1Hc59bQMsk8EZdV7TzKx 0N1Tb2qL4k5o50UI+vdLmDsQSFv32KI= X-Stat-Signature: j31g5enbbfzn8nyydy11rmie4r4nscr5 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 622D540084 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=jE8+1Eoa; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of seanjc@google.com designates 209.85.210.172 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=seanjc@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-HE-Tag: 1655303391-969627 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 15, 2022, Chao Peng wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:59:41PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 12:09 PM Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > This patch series is fairly close to implementing a rather more > > > > efficient solution. I'm not familiar enough with hypervisor userspace > > > > to really know if this would work, but: > > > > > > > > What if shared guest memory could also be file-backed, either in the > > > > same fd or with a second fd covering the shared portion of a memslot? > > > > This would allow changes to the backing store (punching holes, etc) to > > > > be some without mmap_lock or host-userspace TLB flushes? Depending on > > > > what the guest is doing with its shared memory, userspace might need > > > > the memory mapped or it might not. > > > > > > That's what I'm angling for with the F_SEAL_FAULT_ALLOCATIONS idea. The issue, > > > unless I'm misreading code, is that punching a hole in the shared memory backing > > > store doesn't prevent reallocating that hole on fault, i.e. a helper process that > > > keeps a valid mapping of guest shared memory can silently fill the hole. > > > > > > What we're hoping to achieve is a way to prevent allocating memory without a very > > > explicit action from userspace, e.g. fallocate(). > > > > Ah, I misunderstood. I thought your goal was to mmap it and prevent > > page faults from allocating. I don't think you misunderstood, that's also one of the goals. The use case is that multiple processes in the host mmap() guest memory, and we'd like to be able to punch a hole without having to rendezvous with all processes and also to prevent an unintentional re-allocation. > I think we still need the mmap, but want to prevent allocating when > userspace touches previously mmaped area that has never filled the page. Yes, or if a chunk was filled at some point but then was removed via PUNCH_HOLE. > I don't have clear answer if other operations like read/write should be > also prevented (probably yes). And only after an explicit fallocate() to > allocate the page these operations would act normally. I always forget about read/write. I believe reads should be ok, the semantics of holes are that they return zeros, i.e. can use ZERO_PAGE() and not allocate a new backing page. Not sure what to do about writes though. Allocating on direct writes might be ok for our use case, but that could also result in a rather wierd API. > > It is indeed the case (and has been since before quite a few of us > > were born) that a hole in a sparse file is logically just a bunch of > > zeros. A way to make a file for which a hole is an actual hole seems > > like it would solve this problem nicely. It could also be solved more > > specifically for KVM by making sure that the private/shared mode that > > userspace programs is strict enough to prevent accidental allocations > > -- if a GPA is definitively private, shared, neither, or (potentially, > > on TDX only) both, then a page that *isn't* shared will never be > > accidentally allocated by KVM. > > KVM is clever enough to not allocate since it knows a GPA is shared or > not. This case it's the host userspace that can cause the allocating and > is too complex to check on every access from guest. Yes, KVM is not in the picture at all. KVM won't trigger allocation, but KVM also is not in a position to prevent userspace from touching memory. > > If the shared backing is not mmapped, > > it also won't be accidentally allocated by host userspace on a stray > > or careless write. > > As said above, mmap is still prefered, otherwise too many changes are > needed for usespace VMM. Forcing userspace to change doesn't bother me too much, the biggest concern is having to take mmap_lock for write in a per-host process.