From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/memory-failure: release private data before split THP
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:01:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yupxv9+ziR+utiHX@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220803025243.155798-1-fengwei.yin@intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:52:43AM +0800, Yin Fengwei wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index da39ec8afca8..08e21973b120 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1484,7 +1484,16 @@ static int identify_page_state(unsigned long pfn, struct page *p,
>
> static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, const char *msg)
> {
> + struct page *head = compound_head(page);
> +
> lock_page(page);
> + /*
> + * If thp page has private data attached, thp split will fail.
> + * Release private data before split thp.
> + */
> + if (page_has_private(head))
> + try_to_release_page(head, GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> if (unlikely(split_huge_page(page))) {
> unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
It seems a shame to use the old page approach instead of the
shiny new folio approach. We're quite close to being able to remove
try_to_release_page() in 6.1 or 6.2 so adding a new caller is a bad idea.
How about this:
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index da39ec8afca8..765b383288b1 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -1484,16 +1484,21 @@ static int identify_page_state(unsigned long pfn, struct page *p,
static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, const char *msg)
{
- lock_page(page);
+ struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
+
+ folio_lock(folio);
+ if (folio_test_private(folio))
+ filemap_release_folio(folio, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(split_huge_page(page))) {
unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
- unlock_page(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
pr_info("%s: %#lx: thp split failed\n", msg, pfn);
- put_page(page);
+ folio_put(folio);
return -EBUSY;
}
- unlock_page(page);
+ folio = page_folio(page);
+ folio_unlock(folio);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-03 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-03 2:52 [RFC PATCH] mm/memory-failure: release private data before split THP Yin Fengwei
2022-08-03 9:39 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-08-03 14:42 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-03 13:01 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-08-03 13:32 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-03 13:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-03 13:40 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-03 14:33 ` Yin, Fengwei
2022-08-03 15:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-08-04 1:19 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-08-04 1:54 ` Yin Fengwei
2022-08-04 2:05 ` Miaohe Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yupxv9+ziR+utiHX@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).