linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 10:42:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzJi/NmT3jW1jw4C@feng-clx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZfSv98uvxop7YN_L-F=WNVkb5rcwa6Nmf5yN-59p8Sr4Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:11:24AM +0800, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 8:54 AM Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> 
> Hi Feng,
> 
> > kzalloc/kmalloc will round up the request size to a fixed size
> > (mostly power of 2), so the allocated memory could be more than
> > requested. Currently kzalloc family APIs will zero all the
> > allocated memory.
> >
> > To detect out-of-bound usage of the extra allocated memory, only
> > zero the requested part, so that sanity check could be added to
> > the extra space later.
> 
> I still don't like the idea of only zeroing the requested memory and
> not the whole object. Considering potential info-leak vulnerabilities.
> 
> Can we only do this when SLAB_DEBUG is enabled?

Good point! will add slub_debug_orig_size(s) check. 

> > Performance wise, smaller zeroing length also brings shorter
> > execution time, as shown from test data on various server/desktop
> > platforms.
> >
> > For kzalloc users who will call ksize() later and utilize this
> > extra space, please be aware that the space is not zeroed any
> > more.
> 
> CC Kees
 
Thanks for adding Kees, who provided review from security point
of review.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/slab.c |  7 ++++---
> >  mm/slab.h |  5 +++--
> >  mm/slub.c | 10 +++++++---
[...]
> > @@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ static inline struct kmem_cache *slab_pre_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> >
> >  static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> >                                         struct obj_cgroup *objcg, gfp_t flags,
> > -                                       size_t size, void **p, bool init)
> > +                                       size_t size, void **p, bool init,
> > +                                       unsigned int orig_size)
> >  {
> >         size_t i;
> >
> > @@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s,
> >         for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> >                 p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], flags, init);
> >                 if (p[i] && init && !kasan_has_integrated_init())
> > -                       memset(p[i], 0, s->object_size);
> > +                       memset(p[i], 0, orig_size);
> 
> Note that when KASAN is enabled and has integrated init, it will
> initialize the whole object, which leads to an inconsistency with this
> change.

Do you mean for kzalloc() only? or there is some kasan check newly added?

I'm not familiar with kasan code, and during development, I usually
enabled KASAN and KFENCE configs and did catch some bugs, while 0Day
bot also reported some. And with latest v6 patchset, I haven't seen
kasan/kfence failed cases.

And for generic slub objects, when slub_debug is enabled, the object
data area could be already modified like in init_object() 

	if (s->flags & __OBJECT_POISON) {
		memset(p, POISON_FREE, s->object_size - 1);
		p[s->object_size - 1] = POISON_END;
	}

slub-redzone check actually splitis it into 2 regions [0, orig_size-1],
and [orig_size, object_size-1], and adds different sanity check to
them.

Anyway, I'll go check the latest linux-next tree.

Thanks,
Feng





  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-13  6:54 [PATCH v6 0/4] mm/slub: some debug enhancements for kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-13  6:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] mm/slub: enable debugging memory wasting of kmalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-23 11:43   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-09-24  7:08     ` Feng Tang
2022-10-30 19:23   ` John Thomson
2022-10-30 21:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-10-31  2:36       ` Feng Tang
2022-10-31 10:05         ` John Thomson
2022-10-31 11:36           ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-10-31 11:42           ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01  0:18             ` John Thomson
2022-11-01  2:41               ` John Thomson
2022-11-01  7:57               ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01  9:20                 ` John Thomson
2022-11-01  9:31                   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 10:33                     ` John Thomson
2022-11-01 10:42                       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-01 13:55                         ` Feng Tang
2022-11-01 19:39                           ` John Thomson
2022-11-02  6:08                             ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02  7:16                               ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03  7:18                                 ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03  7:45                                   ` John Thomson
2022-11-03  8:16                                     ` Feng Tang
2022-11-02  8:22                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03  5:54                         ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03  8:33                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 14:16                             ` Feng Tang
2022-11-03 14:36                               ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-11-03 16:57                                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-03 17:35                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-11-04  3:52                                     ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13  6:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] mm/slub: only zero the requested size of buffer for kzalloc Feng Tang
2022-09-26 19:11   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-26 20:15     ` Kees Cook
2022-09-27  1:22       ` Feng Tang
2022-09-27  2:42     ` Feng Tang [this message]
2022-10-13 14:00       ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-10-14  5:59         ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13  6:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] mm: kasan: Add free_meta size info in struct kasan_cache Feng Tang
2022-09-20 19:20   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-21 12:02     ` Feng Tang
2022-09-24 18:05       ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-25 11:26         ` Feng Tang
2022-09-25 16:31           ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-27  3:03             ` Feng Tang
2022-09-13  6:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] mm/slub: extend redzone check to extra allocated kmalloc space than requested Feng Tang
2022-09-13  8:53   ` Hyeonggon Yoo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzJi/NmT3jW1jw4C@feng-clx \
    --to=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).