From: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Oliver Upton" <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"Huacai Chen" <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Xiaoyao Li" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"Xu Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
"Chao Peng" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"Fuad Tabba" <tabba@google.com>,
"Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
"Anish Moorthy" <amoorthy@google.com>,
"Yu Zhang" <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>,
"Isaku Yamahata" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Vishal Annapurve" <vannapurve@google.com>,
"Ackerley Tng" <ackerleytng@google.com>,
"Maciej Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Quentin Perret" <qperret@google.com>,
"Michael Roth" <michael.roth@amd.com>,
Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
"Liam Merwick" <liam.merwick@oracle.com>,
"Isaku Yamahata" <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/35] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:53:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZT_fnAcDAvuPCwws@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231027182217.3615211-4-seanjc@google.com>
On 2023-10-27 11:21 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> From: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
>
> Currently in mmu_notifier invalidate path, hva range is recorded and
> then checked against by mmu_notifier_retry_hva() in the page fault
> handling path. However, for the to be introduced private memory, a page
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is there a missing word here?
> fault may not have a hva associated, checking gfn(gpa) makes more sense.
>
> For existing hva based shared memory, gfn is expected to also work. The
> only downside is when aliasing multiple gfns to a single hva, the
> current algorithm of checking multiple ranges could result in a much
> larger range being rejected. Such aliasing should be uncommon, so the
> impact is expected small.
>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> Cc: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> [sean: convert vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr() to gfn-based API]
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++++----
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 11 +++++------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index f7901cb4d2fa..d33657d61d80 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -3056,7 +3056,7 @@ static void direct_pte_prefetch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
> *
> * There are several ways to safely use this helper:
> *
> - * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_hva() after grabbing the mapping level, before
> + * - Check mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn() after grabbing the mapping level, before
> * consuming it. In this case, mmu_lock doesn't need to be held during the
> * lookup, but it does need to be held while checking the MMU notifier.
> *
> @@ -4358,7 +4358,7 @@ static bool is_page_fault_stale(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return true;
>
> return fault->slot &&
> - mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->hva);
> + mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(vcpu->kvm, fault->mmu_seq, fault->gfn);
> }
>
> static int direct_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> @@ -6245,7 +6245,9 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
>
> write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>
> - kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(kvm, 0, -1ul);
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(kvm);
> +
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
>
> flush = kvm_rmap_zap_gfn_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end);
>
> @@ -6255,7 +6257,7 @@ void kvm_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end)
> if (flush)
> kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_range(kvm, gfn_start, gfn_end - gfn_start);
>
> - kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm, 0, -1ul);
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(kvm);
>
> write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 72e3943f3693..6e502ba93141 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -6757,10 +6757,10 @@ static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> /*
> - * Grab the memslot so that the hva lookup for the mmu_notifier retry
> - * is guaranteed to use the same memslot as the pfn lookup, i.e. rely
> - * on the pfn lookup's validation of the memslot to ensure a valid hva
> - * is used for the retry check.
> + * Explicitly grab the memslot using KVM's internal slot ID to ensure
> + * KVM doesn't unintentionally grab a userspace memslot. It _should_
> + * be impossible for userspace to create a memslot for the APIC when
> + * APICv is enabled, but paranoia won't hurt in this case.
> */
> slot = id_to_memslot(slots, APIC_ACCESS_PAGE_PRIVATE_MEMSLOT);
> if (!slot || slot->flags & KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID)
> @@ -6785,8 +6785,7 @@ static void vmx_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return;
>
> read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> - if (mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(kvm, mmu_seq,
> - gfn_to_hva_memslot(slot, gfn))) {
> + if (mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(kvm, mmu_seq, gfn)) {
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_APIC_PAGE_RELOAD, vcpu);
> read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
> goto out;
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index fb6c6109fdca..11d091688346 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -787,8 +787,8 @@ struct kvm {
> struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
> unsigned long mmu_invalidate_seq;
> long mmu_invalidate_in_progress;
> - unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_start;
> - unsigned long mmu_invalidate_range_end;
> + gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_start;
> + gfn_t mmu_invalidate_range_end;
> #endif
> struct list_head devices;
> u64 manual_dirty_log_protect;
> @@ -1392,10 +1392,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> void *kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *mc);
> #endif
>
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end);
What is the reason to separate range_add() from begin()?
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
> @@ -1970,9 +1969,9 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mmu_seq)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
> +static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
> unsigned long mmu_seq,
> - unsigned long hva)
> + gfn_t gfn)
> {
> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> /*
> @@ -1981,10 +1980,20 @@ static inline int mmu_invalidate_retry_hva(struct kvm *kvm,
> * that might be being invalidated. Note that it may include some false
> * positives, due to shortcuts when handing concurrent invalidations.
> */
> - if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress) &&
> - hva >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
> - hva < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
> - return 1;
> + if (unlikely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress)) {
> + /*
> + * Dropping mmu_lock after bumping mmu_invalidate_in_progress
> + * but before updating the range is a KVM bug.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start == INVALID_GPA ||
> + kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end == INVALID_GPA))
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (gfn >= kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start &&
> + gfn < kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end)
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> if (kvm->mmu_invalidate_seq != mmu_seq)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 5a97e6c7d9c2..1a577a25de47 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -543,9 +543,7 @@ static inline struct kvm *mmu_notifier_to_kvm(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
>
> typedef bool (*gfn_handler_t)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range);
>
> -typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end);
> -
> +typedef void (*on_lock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
> typedef void (*on_unlock_fn_t)(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range {
> @@ -637,7 +635,8 @@ static __always_inline int __kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
> locked = true;
> KVM_MMU_LOCK(kvm);
> if (!IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->on_lock))
> - range->on_lock(kvm, range->start, range->end);
> + range->on_lock(kvm);
> +
> if (IS_KVM_NULL_FN(range->handler))
> break;
> }
> @@ -742,16 +741,29 @@ static void kvm_mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> kvm_handle_hva_range(mn, address, address + 1, arg, kvm_change_spte_gfn);
> }
>
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end)
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> /*
> * The count increase must become visible at unlock time as no
> * spte can be established without taking the mmu_lock and
> * count is also read inside the mmu_lock critical section.
> */
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress++;
> +
> if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress == 1)) {
> + kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = INVALID_GPA;
> + kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end = INVALID_GPA;
I don't think this is incorrect, but I was a little suprised to see this
here rather than in end() when mmu_invalidate_in_progress decrements to
0.
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start, gfn_t end)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
Does this compile/function on KVM architectures with
!KVM_HAVE_MMU_RWLOCK? I assumed we would get an email from the buildbot
if it didn't compile but I don't know if buildbot builds with lockdep
enabled.
On this topic, I wonder if we should just bit the bullet and convert all
architectures to a rwlock_t.
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress);
> +
> + if (likely(kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start == INVALID_GPA)) {
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start = start;
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_end = end;
> } else {
> @@ -771,6 +783,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
> +{
> + kvm_mmu_invalidate_range_add(kvm, range->start, range->end);
> + return kvm_unmap_gfn_range(kvm, range);
> +}
> +
> static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
> {
> @@ -778,7 +796,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> const struct kvm_mmu_notifier_range hva_range = {
> .start = range->start,
> .end = range->end,
> - .handler = kvm_unmap_gfn_range,
> + .handler = kvm_mmu_unmap_gfn_range,
> .on_lock = kvm_mmu_invalidate_begin,
> .on_unlock = kvm_arch_guest_memory_reclaimed,
> .flush_on_ret = true,
> @@ -817,8 +835,7 @@ static int kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
> - unsigned long end)
> +void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> /*
> * This sequence increase will notify the kvm page fault that
> @@ -834,6 +851,12 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_end(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
Let's add a lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock) here too while
we're at it?
> */
> kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress--;
> KVM_BUG_ON(kvm->mmu_invalidate_in_progress < 0, kvm);
> +
> + /*
> + * Assert that at least one range was added between start() and end().
> + * Not adding a range isn't fatal, but it is a KVM bug.
> + */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(kvm->mmu_invalidate_range_start == INVALID_GPA);
> }
>
> static void kvm_mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> --
> 2.42.0.820.g83a721a137-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-30 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 148+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-27 18:21 [PATCH v13 00/35] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 01/35] KVM: Tweak kvm_hva_range and hva_handler_t to allow reusing for gfn ranges Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 12:46 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 02/35] KVM: Assert that mmu_invalidate_in_progress *never* goes negative Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 12:46 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 03/35] KVM: Use gfn instead of hva for mmu_notifier_retry Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-30 16:53 ` David Matlack [this message]
2023-10-30 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-30 18:21 ` David Matlack
2023-10-30 18:19 ` David Matlack
2023-11-01 15:31 ` Xu Yilun
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 04/35] KVM: WARN if there are dangling MMU invalidations at VM destruction Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 12:50 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 05/35] KVM: PPC: Drop dead code related to KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 12:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 06/35] KVM: PPC: Return '1' unconditionally for KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 07/35] KVM: Convert KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_MMU_NOTIFIER Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 12:54 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 08/35] KVM: Introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 16:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-30 20:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 22:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 23:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-31 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 2:26 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-10-31 14:04 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 14:19 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 09/35] KVM: Add KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT exit to report faults to userspace Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 7:30 ` Binbin Wu
2023-11-01 10:52 ` Huang, Kai
2023-11-01 17:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 2:19 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-11-02 15:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 3:17 ` Huang, Kai
2023-11-02 9:35 ` Huang, Kai
2023-11-02 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 18:35 ` Huang, Kai
2023-11-02 15:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 11:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-03 4:09 ` Xu Yilun
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 10/35] KVM: Add a dedicated mmu_notifier flag for reclaiming freed memory Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 13:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 11/35] KVM: Drop .on_unlock() mmu_notifier hook Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 13:55 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 12/35] KVM: Prepare for handling only shared mappings in mmu_notifier events Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-30 22:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 5:59 ` Binbin Wu
2023-11-02 11:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 14:01 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-02 14:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 14:57 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 13/35] KVM: Introduce per-page memory attributes Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 8:11 ` Chao Gao
2023-10-30 16:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 22:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 16:43 ` David Matlack
2023-11-02 3:01 ` Huang, Kai
2023-11-02 10:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 10:55 ` Huang, Kai
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 14/35] mm: Add AS_UNMOVABLE to mark mapping as completely unmovable Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 15/35] fs: Export anon_inode_getfile_secure() for use by KVM Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 16:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-11-03 10:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 16/35] KVM: Add KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD ioctl() for guest-specific backing memory Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 2:27 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-10-31 6:30 ` Chao Gao
2023-10-31 14:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 15:05 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-31 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 22:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 10:51 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-01 21:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 13:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-03 23:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 18:24 ` David Matlack
2023-10-31 21:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 22:39 ` David Matlack
2023-11-02 15:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 16:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 16:28 ` David Matlack
2023-11-02 17:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-03 9:42 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-04 10:26 ` Xu Yilun
2023-11-06 15:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:21 ` [PATCH v13 17/35] KVM: Add transparent hugepage support for dedicated guest memory Sean Christopherson
2023-10-31 8:35 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-10-31 14:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 7:25 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-11-01 13:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 16:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 22:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-01 22:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-01 23:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 15:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 15:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-27 11:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-11-29 22:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 18/35] KVM: x86: "Reset" vcpu->run->exit_reason early in KVM_RUN Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 14:16 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 19/35] KVM: x86: Disallow hugepages when memory attributes are mixed Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 20/35] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle page fault for private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 14:34 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-05 13:02 ` Xu Yilun
2023-11-05 16:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-06 13:29 ` Xu Yilun
2023-11-06 15:56 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 21/35] KVM: Drop superfluous __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE macro Sean Christopherson
2023-11-02 14:35 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 22/35] KVM: Allow arch code to track number of memslot address spaces per VM Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-02 14:52 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 23/35] KVM: x86: Add support for "protected VMs" that can utilize private memory Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-11-06 11:00 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-11-06 11:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 24/35] KVM: selftests: Drop unused kvm_userspace_memory_region_find() helper Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 25/35] KVM: selftests: Convert lib's mem regions to KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 14:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-04-25 14:45 ` Shuah Khan
2024-04-25 15:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-04-25 16:22 ` Shuah Khan
2024-04-26 7:33 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 26/35] KVM: selftests: Add support for creating private memslots Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 27/35] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to convert guest memory b/w private and shared Sean Christopherson
2023-11-06 11:26 ` Fuad Tabba
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 28/35] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to do KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercalls (x86) Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 29/35] KVM: selftests: Introduce VM "shape" to allow tests to specify the VM type Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 30/35] KVM: selftests: Add GUEST_SYNC[1-6] macros for synchronizing more data Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 31/35] KVM: selftests: Add x86-only selftest for private memory conversions Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 32/35] KVM: selftests: Add KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 helper Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 33/35] KVM: selftests: Expand set_memory_region_test to validate guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 34/35] KVM: selftests: Add basic selftest for guest_memfd() Sean Christopherson
2023-10-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v13 35/35] KVM: selftests: Test KVM exit behavior for private memory/access Sean Christopherson
2023-10-30 17:39 ` [PATCH v13 00/35] KVM: guest_memfd() and per-page attributes Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZT_fnAcDAvuPCwws@google.com \
--to=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).