linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added with platform
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 10:21:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a07711a8-f24b-be8d-8570-6447e66768d9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611543532-18698-2-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

On 25.01.21 03:58, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This introduces mhp_range_allowed() which can be called in various memory
> hotplug paths to prevalidate the address range which is being added, with
> the platform. Then mhp_range_allowed() calls mhp_get_pluggable_range()
> which provides applicable address range depending on whether linear mapping
> is required or not. For ranges that require linear mapping, it calls a new
> arch callback arch_get_mappable_range() which the platform can override. So
> the new callback, in turn provides the platform an opportunity to configure
> acceptable memory hotplug address ranges in case there are constraints.
> 
> This mechanism will help prevent platform specific errors deep down during
> hotplug calls. This drops now redundant check_hotplug_memory_addressable()
> check in __add_pages() but instead adds a VM_BUG_ON() check which would
> ensure that the range has been validated with mhp_range_allowed() earlier
> in the call chain. Besides mhp_get_pluggable_range() also can be used by
> potential memory hotplug callers to avail the allowed physical range which
> would go through on a given platform.
> 
> This does not really add any new range check in generic memory hotplug but
> instead compensates for lost checks in arch_add_memory() where applicable
> and check_hotplug_memory_addressable(), with unified mhp_range_allowed().
> 
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

[...]

> +
> +struct range mhp_get_pluggable_range(bool need_mapping)
> +{
> +	const u64 max_phys = (1ULL << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1;
> +	struct range mhp_range;
> +
> +	if (need_mapping) {
> +		mhp_range = arch_get_mappable_range();
> +		if (mhp_range.start > max_phys) {
> +			mhp_range.start = 0;
> +			mhp_range.end = 0;
> +		}
> +		mhp_range.end = min_t(u64, mhp_range.end, max_phys);
> +	} else {
> +		mhp_range.start = 0;
> +		mhp_range.end = max_phys;
> +	}
> +	return mhp_range;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mhp_get_pluggable_range);


Some people might prefer the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() going to the actual
user (patch #4), I don't care :) Thanks!

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb



  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-25  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-25  2:58 [PATCH V4 0/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  2:58 ` [PATCH V4 1/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Prevalidate the address range being added " Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  9:21   ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-01-25  2:58 ` [PATCH V4 2/4] arm64/mm: Define arch_get_mappable_range() Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  2:58 ` [PATCH V4 3/4] s390/mm: " Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  2:58 ` [PATCH V4 4/4] virtio-mem: check against mhp_get_pluggable_range() which memory we can hotplug Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25 12:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-01-27  3:42     ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  9:25 ` [PATCH V4 0/4] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform David Hildenbrand
2021-01-25  9:52   ` Anshuman Khandual
2021-01-25  9:53     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a07711a8-f24b-be8d-8570-6447e66768d9@redhat.com \
    --to=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).