From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: <qiwuchen55@gmail.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm/sparsemem: use wrapped macros instead of open-coding
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:10:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a731692c-0a04-2926-a573-d49e4f9c2efe@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1583489966-16390-1-git-send-email-qiwuchen55@gmail.com>
On 3/6/20 2:19 AM, qiwuchen55@gmail.com wrote:
> From: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
>
> Use wrapped macros instead of open-coding for better code
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: chenqiwu <chenqiwu@xiaomi.com>
This breaks my x86 (64-bit) build:
mm/sparse.c: In function ‘check_usemap_section_nr’:
mm/sparse.c:389:33: error: implicit declaration of function ‘virt_to_pfn’; did you mean ‘virt_to_phys’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
389 | usemap_snr = pfn_to_section_nr(virt_to_pfn(usage));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| virt_to_phys
...and I think the reason is that the arch/x86/include/asm/page.h does not
have virt_to_pfn(). For that reason, I'm concerned that the following fix,
which fixes up x86, may not completely correct for the patch.
Here's a compile-tested (only, and only on x86 64-bit) fix:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
index 7555b48803a8..982bc76bf13c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page.h
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ static inline void copy_user_page(void *to, void *from, unsigned long vaddr,
#define __boot_va(x) __va(x)
#define __boot_pa(x) __pa(x)
+#define virt_to_pfn(kaddr) (__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
+#define pfn_to_virt(pfn) __va((pfn) << PAGE_SHIFT)
+
/*
* virt_to_page(kaddr) returns a valid pointer if and only if
* virt_addr_valid(kaddr) returns true.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
> ---
> mm/sparse.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 42c18a3..9b14164 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static void __init check_usemap_section_nr(int nid,
> old_pgdat_snr = NR_MEM_SECTIONS;
> }
>
> - usemap_snr = pfn_to_section_nr(__pa(usage) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> - pgdat_snr = pfn_to_section_nr(__pa(pgdat) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + usemap_snr = pfn_to_section_nr(virt_to_pfn(usage));
> + pgdat_snr = pfn_to_section_nr(virt_to_pfn(pgdat));
> if (usemap_snr == pgdat_snr)
> return;
>
> @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ struct page * __meminit populate_section_memmap(unsigned long pfn,
>
> return NULL;
> got_map_page:
> - ret = (struct page *)pfn_to_kaddr(page_to_pfn(page));
> + ret = (struct page *)page_to_virt(page);
> got_map_ptr:
>
> return ret;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 10:19 [RESEND PATCH] mm/sparsemem: use wrapped macros instead of open-coding qiwuchen55
2020-03-11 2:10 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2020-03-11 8:01 ` chenqiwu
2020-03-12 1:09 ` John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a731692c-0a04-2926-a573-d49e4f9c2efe@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chenqiwu@xiaomi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=qiwuchen55@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).