From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: bail out early if huge zero page
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:25:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a8b12a42-5462-605e-ecc6-38d074f0a077@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YlU41tpoMZmElUeB@localhost.localdomain>
On 2022/4/12 16:31, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:22:34PM +0800, Xu Yu wrote:
>> Kernel panic when injecting memory_failure for the global huge_zero_page,
>> when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is enabled, as follows.
> ...
>> In fact, huge_zero_page is unhandlable currently in either soft offline
>> or memory failure injection. With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM disabled,
>> huge_zero_page is bailed out when checking HWPoisonHandlable() in
>> get_any_page(), or checking page mapping in split_huge_page_to_list().
>>
>> This makes huge_zero_page bail out early in madvise_inject_error(), and
>> panic above won't happen again.
>
> I would not special case this in madvise_inject_error() but rather
> handle it in memory-failure code.
> We do already have HWPoisonHandlable(), which tells us whether the page
> is of a type we can really do something about, so why not add another
> check in HWPoisonHandlable() for huge_zero_page(), and have that checked
> in memory_failure().
IIUC, this does not work. Because HWPoisonHandlable is only called in !MF_COUNT_INCREASED case.
But MF_COUNT_INCREASED is always set when called from madvise_inject_error, so HWPoisonHandlable
is not even called in this scene. Or am I miss something?
BTW: IIRC, LRU isn't set on huge_zero_page. So the origin HWPoisonHandlable can already filter out this page.
Thanks!
> Something like (untested):
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index dcb6bb9cf731..dccd0503f803 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1181,6 +1181,10 @@ static inline bool HWPoisonHandlable(struct page *page, unsigned long flags)
> {
> bool movable = false;
>
> + /* Can't handle huge_zero_page() */
> + if(is_huge_zero_page(compound_head(page)))
> + return false;
> +
> /* Soft offline could mirgate non-LRU movable pages */
> if ((flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE) && __PageMovable(page))
> movable = true;
> @@ -1796,6 +1800,10 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> res = -EBUSY;
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
> + } else if(!HWPoisonHandable(p)) {
> + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_UNKNOWN, MF_IGNORED);
> + res = -EBUSY;
> + goto unlock_mutex;
> }
>
> if (PageTransHuge(hpage)) {
>
> It can certainly be prettier, but you can get the idea.
>
>
>>
>> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> mm/madvise.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 1873616a37d2..03ad50d222e0 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>>
>> for (; start < end; start += size) {
>> unsigned long pfn;
>> - struct page *page;
>> + struct page *page, *head;
>> int ret;
>>
>> ret = get_user_pages_fast(start, 1, 0, &page);
>> @@ -1087,12 +1087,21 @@ static int madvise_inject_error(int behavior,
>> return ret;
>> pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>
>> + head = compound_head(page);
>> + if (unlikely(is_huge_zero_page(head))) {
>> + pr_warn("Unhandlable attempt to %s pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
>> + behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE ? "soft offline" :
>> + "inject memory failure for",
>> + pfn, start);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * When soft offlining hugepages, after migrating the page
>> * we dissolve it, therefore in the second loop "page" will
>> * no longer be a compound page.
>> */
>> - size = page_size(compound_head(page));
>> + size = page_size(head);
>>
>> if (behavior == MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE) {
>> pr_info("Soft offlining pfn %#lx at process virtual address %#lx\n",
>> --
>> 2.20.1.2432.ga663e714
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-12 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-10 15:22 [PATCH] mm/memory-failure.c: bail out early if huge zero page Xu Yu
2022-04-11 2:18 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-12 9:09 ` Naoya Horiguchi
2022-04-12 9:45 ` Yu Xu
2022-04-12 10:00 ` Yu Xu
2022-04-12 11:11 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-12 11:08 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-13 8:36 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-04-13 9:03 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-12 8:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-04-12 9:25 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-04-12 9:30 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-04-12 9:47 ` Yu Xu
2022-04-12 10:58 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-04-12 8:59 ` Yu Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a8b12a42-5462-605e-ecc6-38d074f0a077@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=xuyu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).