From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4988C4707E for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 22:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF33613F4 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 22:14:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7FF33613F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 0F2998E0068; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:13:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B09508E006A; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:13:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 45A1A8E006B; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:13:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0201.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29A28E0065 for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 18:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641A1824999B for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 22:13:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78166641126.17.00A99DF Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by imf09.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5306600012A for ; Fri, 21 May 2021 22:13:40 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: Y1b/nkcMvNEDuawuXdR1q4GfFLk+Bv+VCZlh4wiXVAKZEbdPFAzG5iWIbbLmyGqhtnvmz4T/p5 MCNapC/BBhPA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9991"; a="287124042" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="287124042" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 15:13:38 -0700 IronPort-SDR: jtDWZcti7sEveuaV9HEfsR/HN2CIdps0x0Q2qOJryXDsgPqIuT07wA1tNNAZJ26pdjz4bnhV12 mdHLz+OqxuRA== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,319,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="441116328" Received: from djayapra-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.212.209.34]) ([10.212.209.34]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 May 2021 15:13:38 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm/page_alloc: Adjust pcp->high after CPU hotplug events To: Mel Gorman , Linux-MM Cc: Dave Hansen , Matthew Wilcox , Vlastimil Babka , Michal Hocko , Nicholas Piggin , LKML References: <20210521102826.28552-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20210521102826.28552-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net> From: Dave Hansen Autocrypt: addr=dave.hansen@intel.com; keydata= xsFNBE6HMP0BEADIMA3XYkQfF3dwHlj58Yjsc4E5y5G67cfbt8dvaUq2fx1lR0K9h1bOI6fC oAiUXvGAOxPDsB/P6UEOISPpLl5IuYsSwAeZGkdQ5g6m1xq7AlDJQZddhr/1DC/nMVa/2BoY 2UnKuZuSBu7lgOE193+7Uks3416N2hTkyKUSNkduyoZ9F5twiBhxPJwPtn/wnch6n5RsoXsb ygOEDxLEsSk/7eyFycjE+btUtAWZtx+HseyaGfqkZK0Z9bT1lsaHecmB203xShwCPT49Blxz VOab8668QpaEOdLGhtvrVYVK7x4skyT3nGWcgDCl5/Vp3TWA4K+IofwvXzX2ON/Mj7aQwf5W iC+3nWC7q0uxKwwsddJ0Nu+dpA/UORQWa1NiAftEoSpk5+nUUi0WE+5DRm0H+TXKBWMGNCFn c6+EKg5zQaa8KqymHcOrSXNPmzJuXvDQ8uj2J8XuzCZfK4uy1+YdIr0yyEMI7mdh4KX50LO1 pmowEqDh7dLShTOif/7UtQYrzYq9cPnjU2ZW4qd5Qz2joSGTG9eCXLz5PRe5SqHxv6ljk8mb ApNuY7bOXO/A7T2j5RwXIlcmssqIjBcxsRRoIbpCwWWGjkYjzYCjgsNFL6rt4OL11OUF37wL QcTl7fbCGv53KfKPdYD5hcbguLKi/aCccJK18ZwNjFhqr4MliQARAQABzShEYXZpZCBDaHJp c3RvcGhlciBIYW5zZW4gPGRhdmVAc3I3MS5uZXQ+wsF7BBMBAgAlAhsDBgsJCAcDAgYVCAIJ CgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAUCTo3k0QIZAQAKCRBoNZUwcMmSsMO2D/421Xg8pimb9mPzM5N7khT0 2MCnaGssU1T59YPE25kYdx2HntwdO0JA27Wn9xx5zYijOe6B21ufrvsyv42auCO85+oFJWfE K2R/IpLle09GDx5tcEmMAHX6KSxpHmGuJmUPibHVbfep2aCh9lKaDqQR07gXXWK5/yU1Dx0r VVFRaHTasp9fZ9AmY4K9/BSA3VkQ8v3OrxNty3OdsrmTTzO91YszpdbjjEFZK53zXy6tUD2d e1i0kBBS6NLAAsqEtneplz88T/v7MpLmpY30N9gQU3QyRC50jJ7LU9RazMjUQY1WohVsR56d ORqFxS8ChhyJs7BI34vQusYHDTp6PnZHUppb9WIzjeWlC7Jc8lSBDlEWodmqQQgp5+6AfhTD kDv1a+W5+ncq+Uo63WHRiCPuyt4di4/0zo28RVcjtzlGBZtmz2EIC3vUfmoZbO/Gn6EKbYAn rzz3iU/JWV8DwQ+sZSGu0HmvYMt6t5SmqWQo/hyHtA7uF5Wxtu1lCgolSQw4t49ZuOyOnQi5 f8R3nE7lpVCSF1TT+h8kMvFPv3VG7KunyjHr3sEptYxQs4VRxqeirSuyBv1TyxT+LdTm6j4a mulOWf+YtFRAgIYyyN5YOepDEBv4LUM8Tz98lZiNMlFyRMNrsLV6Pv6SxhrMxbT6TNVS5D+6 UorTLotDZKp5+M7BTQRUY85qARAAsgMW71BIXRgxjYNCYQ3Xs8k3TfAvQRbHccky50h99TUY sqdULbsb3KhmY29raw1bgmyM0a4DGS1YKN7qazCDsdQlxIJp9t2YYdBKXVRzPCCsfWe1dK/q 66UVhRPP8EGZ4CmFYuPTxqGY+dGRInxCeap/xzbKdvmPm01Iw3YFjAE4PQ4hTMr/H76KoDbD cq62U50oKC83ca/PRRh2QqEqACvIH4BR7jueAZSPEDnzwxvVgzyeuhwqHY05QRK/wsKuhq7s UuYtmN92Fasbxbw2tbVLZfoidklikvZAmotg0dwcFTjSRGEg0Gr3p/xBzJWNavFZZ95Rj7Et db0lCt0HDSY5q4GMR+SrFbH+jzUY/ZqfGdZCBqo0cdPPp58krVgtIGR+ja2Mkva6ah94/oQN lnCOw3udS+Eb/aRcM6detZr7XOngvxsWolBrhwTQFT9D2NH6ryAuvKd6yyAFt3/e7r+HHtkU kOy27D7IpjngqP+b4EumELI/NxPgIqT69PQmo9IZaI/oRaKorYnDaZrMXViqDrFdD37XELwQ gmLoSm2VfbOYY7fap/AhPOgOYOSqg3/Nxcapv71yoBzRRxOc4FxmZ65mn+q3rEM27yRztBW9 AnCKIc66T2i92HqXCw6AgoBJRjBkI3QnEkPgohQkZdAb8o9WGVKpfmZKbYBo4pEAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQIACQUCVGPOagIbDAAKCRBoNZUwcMmSsJeCEACCh7P/aaOLKWQxcnw47p4phIVR6pVL e4IEdR7Jf7ZL00s3vKSNT+nRqdl1ugJx9Ymsp8kXKMk9GSfmZpuMQB9c6io1qZc6nW/3TtvK pNGz7KPPtaDzvKA4S5tfrWPnDr7n15AU5vsIZvgMjU42gkbemkjJwP0B1RkifIK60yQqAAlT YZ14P0dIPdIPIlfEPiAWcg5BtLQU4Wg3cNQdpWrCJ1E3m/RIlXy/2Y3YOVVohfSy+4kvvYU3 lXUdPb04UPw4VWwjcVZPg7cgR7Izion61bGHqVqURgSALt2yvHl7cr68NYoFkzbNsGsye9ft M9ozM23JSgMkRylPSXTeh5JIK9pz2+etco3AfLCKtaRVysjvpysukmWMTrx8QnI5Nn5MOlJj 1Ov4/50JY9pXzgIDVSrgy6LYSMc4vKZ3QfCY7ipLRORyalFDF3j5AGCMRENJjHPD6O7bl3Xo 4DzMID+8eucbXxKiNEbs21IqBZbbKdY1GkcEGTE7AnkA3Y6YB7I/j9mQ3hCgm5muJuhM/2Fr OPsw5tV/LmQ5GXH0JQ/TZXWygyRFyyI2FqNTx4WHqUn3yFj8rwTAU1tluRUYyeLy0ayUlKBH ybj0N71vWO936MqP6haFERzuPAIpxj2ezwu0xb1GjTk4ynna6h5GjnKgdfOWoRtoWndMZxbA z5cecg== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:13:35 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210521102826.28552-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B5306600012A Authentication-Results: imf09.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf09.hostedemail.com: domain of dave.hansen@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 192.55.52.43) smtp.mailfrom=dave.hansen@intel.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Stat-Signature: qtbptf9tcmiy31w7h47auekeqgcrhocx X-HE-Tag: 1621635220-58083 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 5/21/21 3:28 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > The PCP high watermark is based on the number of online CPUs so the > watermarks must be adjusted during CPU hotplug. At the time of > hot-remove, the number of online CPUs is already adjusted but during > hot-add, a delta needs to be applied to update PCP to the correct > value. After this patch is applied, the high watermarks are adjusted > correctly. >=20 > # grep high: /proc/zoneinfo | tail -1 > high: 649 > # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/online > # grep high: /proc/zoneinfo | tail -1 > high: 664 > # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/online > # grep high: /proc/zoneinfo | tail -1 > high: 649 This is actually a comment more about the previous patch, but it doesn't really become apparent until the example above. In your example, you mentioned increased exit() performance by using "vm.percpu_pagelist_fraction to increase the pcp->high value". That's presumably because of the increased batching effects and fewer lock acquisitions. But, logically, doesn't that mean that, the more CPUs you have in a node, the *higher* you want pcp->high to be? If we took this to the extreme and had an absurd number of CPUs in a node, we could end up with a too-small pcp->high value. Also, do you worry at all about a zone with a low min_free_kbytes seeing increased zone lock contention? ... > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > index bf5cdc466e6c..2761b03b3a44 100644 > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > @@ -6628,7 +6628,7 @@ static int zone_batchsize(struct zone *zone) > #endif > } > =20 > -static int zone_highsize(struct zone *zone) > +static int zone_highsize(struct zone *zone, int cpu_online) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > int high; > @@ -6640,7 +6640,7 @@ static int zone_highsize(struct zone *zone) > * CPUs local to a zone. Note that early in boot that CPUs may > * not be online yet. > */ > - nr_local_cpus =3D max(1U, cpumask_weight(cpumask_of_node(zone_to_nid(= zone)))); > + nr_local_cpus =3D max(1U, cpumask_weight(cpumask_of_node(zone_to_nid(= zone)))) + cpu_online; > high =3D low_wmark_pages(zone) / nr_local_cpus; Is this "+ cpu_online" bias because the CPU isn't in cpumask_of_node() when the CPU hotplug callback occurs? If so, it might be nice to mention= .