linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 linux-api@vger.kernel.org, oleksandr@redhat.com,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>,
	Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>,
	Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>,
	Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] mm: support both pid and pidfd for process_madvise
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:28:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae381f0c96c5a21c9e378d3c93cd819a77b3c0df.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200212233946.246210-9-minchan@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 15:39 -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> There is a demand[1] to support pid as well pidfd for process_madvise
> to reduce unnecessary syscall to get pidfd if the user has control of
> the target process(ie, they could guarantee the process is not gone
> or pid is not reused. Or, it might be okay to give a hint to wrong
> process).
> 
> This patch aims for supporting both options like waitid(2). So, the
> syscall is currently,
> 
> 	int process_madvise(int which, pid_t pid, void *addr,
> 		size_t length, int advise, unsigned long flag);
> 
> @which is actually idtype_t for userspace libray and currently,
> it supports P_PID and P_PIDFD.
> 
> [1]  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9d849087-3359-c4ab-fbec-859e8186c509@virtuozzo.com/
> 
> Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
> Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

So if you move patch 7 up before patch 2 you could squash this patch with
your current patch 2 and drop one patch from your series. It would
probably help to reduce the review overhead as well.



      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-13  0:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-12 23:39 [PATCH v4 0/8] introduce memory hinting API for external process Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] mm: pass task to do_madvise Minchan Kim
2020-02-13  0:21   ` Alexander Duyck
2020-02-13 17:02     ` Minchan Kim
2020-02-13 17:35       ` Jann Horn
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] mm: introduce external memory hinting API Minchan Kim
2020-02-13 14:08   ` Jann Horn
2020-02-13 16:10     ` Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] mm: validate mm in do_madvise Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] mm: check fatal signal pending of target process Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] mm/madvise: employ mmget_still_valid for write lock Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] mm/madvise: allow KSM hints for remote API Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] pid: export pidfd_get_pid Minchan Kim
2020-02-13  0:25   ` Alexander Duyck
2020-02-13 17:08     ` Minchan Kim
2020-02-12 23:39 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] mm: support both pid and pidfd for process_madvise Minchan Kim
2020-02-13  0:28   ` Alexander Duyck [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae381f0c96c5a21c9e378d3c93cd819a77b3c0df.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bgeffon@google.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joaodias@google.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@redhat.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=sonnyrao@google.com \
    --cc=sspatil@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).