From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABAAC433F5 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1C961880 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:14:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3E1C961880 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 912A394007A; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 8C27894003A; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:14:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7B0BF94007A; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:14:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0170.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B38894003A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 22:14:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240498249980 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:14:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78642620826.02.97838A5 Received: from out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-132.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.132]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9316D9000714 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 02:14:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R131e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e01424;MF=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0Uq4fOIK_1632968067; Received: from 30.240.97.26(mailfrom:rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0Uq4fOIK_1632968067) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:14:28 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:14:26 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:93.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/93.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm, thp: check page mapping when truncating page cache Content-Language: en-US To: Song Liu , Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux MM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , William Kucharski , Hugh Dickins References: <20210923194343.ca0f29e1c4d361170343a6f2@linux-foundation.org> <9e41661d-9919-d556-8c49-610dae157553@linux.alibaba.com> <68737431-01d2-e6e3-5131-7d7c731e49ae@linux.alibaba.com> From: Rongwei Wang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9316D9000714 X-Stat-Signature: g7aqnck98fjznp3purrks77s9oog796e Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=alibaba.com; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com designates 115.124.30.132 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1632968071-908236 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 9/30/21 8:41 AM, Song Liu wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 5:02 PM Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 04:41:48PM -0700, Song Liu wrote: >>> The issue is NOT caused by concurrent khugepaged:collapse_file() and >>> truncate_pagecache(inode, 0). With some printks, we can see a clear >>> time gap (>2 second ) between collapse_file() finishes, and >>> truncate_pagecache() (which crashes soon). Therefore, my earlier >>> suggestion that adds deny_write_access() to collapse_file() does NOT >>> work. >>> >>> The crash is actually caused by concurrent truncate_pagecache(inode, 0). >>> If I change the number of write thread in stress_madvise_dso.c to one, >>> (IOW, one thread_read and one thread_write), I cannot reproduce the >>> crash anymore. >>> >>> I think this means we cannot fix this issue in collapse_file(), because it >>> finishes long before the crash. >> >> Ah! So are we missing one or more of these locks: >> >> inode_lock(inode); >> filemap_invalidate_lock(mapping); >> >> in the open path? > > The following fixes the crash in my test. But I am not sure whether this is the > best fix. > > Rongwei, could you please run more tests on it? Yes, I'd like to. > > Thanks, > Song > > > diff --git i/fs/open.c w/fs/open.c > index daa324606a41f..d13c4668b2e53 100644 > --- i/fs/open.c > +++ w/fs/open.c > @@ -856,8 +856,11 @@ static int do_dentry_open(struct file *f, > * of THPs into the page cache will fail. > */ > smp_mb(); > - if (filemap_nr_thps(inode->i_mapping)) > + if (filemap_nr_thps(inode->i_mapping)) { > + filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping); Learned something, Thanks! But, the race between collapse_file and truncate_pagecache, I am not sure whether it exists or not. If exists, whether this patch only can fix truncate_pagecache concurrent? Anyway, I will run more tests on it at first. Thanks! > truncate_pagecache(inode, 0); > + filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping); > + } > } > > return 0; >