From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail191.messagelabs.com (mail191.messagelabs.com [216.82.242.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B026B02A6 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 04:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o758cWdc032387 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:38:32 -0700 Received: from pzk3 (pzk3.prod.google.com [10.243.19.131]) by kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o758cVHl009523 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:38:31 -0700 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so2340318pzk.22 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 01:38:15 -0700 (PDT) From: David Rientjes Subject: Re: [S+Q3 00/23] SLUB: The Unified slab allocator (V3) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100804024514.139976032@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin List-ID: On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > This insta-reboots on my netperf benchmarking servers (but works with > > numa=off), so I'll have to wait until I can hook up a serial before > > benchmarking this series. > > There are potential issues with > > 1. The size of per cpu reservation on bootup and the new percpu code that > allows allocations for per cpu areas during bootup. Sometime I wonder if I > should just go back to static allocs for that. > > 2. The topology information provided by the machine for the cache setup. > > 3. My code of course. > I bisected this to patch 8 but still don't have a bootlog. I'm assuming in the meantime that something is kmallocing DMA memory on this machine prior to kmem_cache_init_late() and get_slab() is returning a NULL pointer. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org