From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1C856B01F0 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:29:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:29:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [S+Q3 00/23] SLUB: The Unified slab allocator (V3) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100804024514.139976032@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , Tejun Heo List-ID: On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I'm really curious why nobody else ran into this problem before, > > especially if they have CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled so > > struct kmem_cache_node has the same size. Perhaps my early bug report > > caused people not to test the series... > > Which patches were applied? If you do not apply all patches then you can be at a stage were kmalloc_caches[0] is still used for kmem_cache_node. Then things break. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org