From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail137.messagelabs.com (mail137.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.19]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781066B01F2 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:47:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:47:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [S+Q3 00/23] SLUB: The Unified slab allocator (V3) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100804024514.139976032@linux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: David Rientjes Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin , Tejun Heo List-ID: On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote: > I didn't know if that was a debugging patch for me or if you wanted to > push that as part of your series, I'm not sure if you actually need to > move it to kmem_cache_init() now that slub_state is protected by > slub_lock. I'm not sure if we want to allocate DMA objects between > kmem_cache_init() and kmem_cache_init_late(). Drivers may allocate dma buffers during initialization. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org