From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f199.google.com (mail-qk0-f199.google.com [209.85.220.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DED6B000E for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f199.google.com with SMTP id e64so2506263qkb.16 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net. [2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 1si7433510qky.303.2018.04.17.09.51.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:51:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Christopher Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/25] Speculative page faults In-Reply-To: <1523975611-15978-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <1523975611-15978-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Laurent Dufour Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Paul E. McKenney" This is part of one thread going back to 2017 when you posted the first RFC. Guess lots of people may not see this given the age of the thread? Could you start a new thread when posting a patchset?