From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
notify@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] Break heap spraying needed for exploiting use-after-free
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:35:50 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010060833000.99155@www.lameter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202010051905.62D79560@keescook>
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, Kees Cook wrote:
> > TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, but if forcing that on by default would enhance security
> > by a measurable amount, it wouldn't be a terribly hard sell ...
>
> Isn't the "easy" version of this already controlled by slab_merge? (i.e.
> do not share same-sized/flagged kmem_caches between different caches)
Right.
> The large trouble are the kmalloc caches, which don't have types
> associated with them. Having implicit kmem caches based on the type
> being allocated there would need some pretty extensive plumbing, I
> think?
Actually typifying those accesses may get rid of a lot of kmalloc
allocations and could help to ease the management and control of objects.
It may be a big task though given the ubiquity of kmalloc and the need to
create a massive amount of new slab caches. This is going to reduce the
cache hit rate significantly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-06 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 18:35 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] Break heap spraying needed for exploiting use-after-free Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/6] mm: Extract SLAB_QUARANTINE from KASAN Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/6] mm/slab: Perform init_on_free earlier Alexander Popov
2020-09-30 12:50 ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-01 19:48 ` Alexander Popov
2020-12-03 19:50 ` Alexander Popov
2020-12-03 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2020-12-04 11:54 ` Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/6] mm: Integrate SLAB_QUARANTINE with init_on_free Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/6] mm: Implement slab quarantine randomization Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] lkdtm: Add heap quarantine tests Alexander Popov
2020-09-29 18:35 ` [PATCH RFC v2 6/6] mm: Add heap quarantine verbose debugging (not for merge) Alexander Popov
2020-10-01 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] Break heap spraying needed for exploiting use-after-free Alexander Popov
2020-10-05 22:56 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-06 0:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-06 0:48 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-06 2:09 ` Kees Cook
2020-10-06 2:16 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-06 2:19 ` Daniel Micay
2020-10-06 8:35 ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2020-10-06 8:32 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-10-06 17:56 ` Alexander Popov
2020-10-06 18:37 ` Jann Horn
2020-10-06 19:25 ` Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2010060833000.99155@www.lameter.com \
--to=cl@linux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=danielmicay@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=notify@kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).