From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51])
	by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D206B007B
	for <linux-mm@kvack.org>; Thu,  7 Jan 2010 11:32:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:31:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001070814080.7821@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001070826410.7821@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20100104182429.833180340@chello.nl> <20100104182813.753545361@chello.nl> <20100105054536.44bf8002@infradead.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001050916300.1074@router.home> <20100105192243.1d6b2213@infradead.org> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001071007210.901@router.home>
 <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001070814080.7821@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "minchan.kim@gmail.com" <minchan.kim@gmail.com>, "hugh.dickins" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
List-ID: <linux-mm.kvack.org>



On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> (Side note: I wonder if we should wake up _all_ readers when we wake up 
> any. Right now, we wake up all readers - but only until we hit a writer. 
> Which is the _fair_ thing to do, but it does mean that we can end up in 
> horrible patterns of alternating readers/writers, when it could be much 
> better to just say "release the hounds" and let all pending readers go 
> after a writer has had its turn).

Btw, this would still be "mostly fair" in the sense that you couldn't 
starve writers. Any writer on the list is still guaranteed to be woken up 
next, because now it will be at the front of the queue.

So it would be starvation-proof - new readers that come in _after_ we've 
woken up all the old ones would not get to pass the writers. It might be 
interesting to test, if somebody has a problematic threaded workload with 
lots of page faults and allocations mixxed.

			Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>