From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f71.google.com (mail-lf0-f71.google.com [209.85.215.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530816B053E for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 16:53:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f71.google.com with SMTP id u13-v6so2394911lff.0 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.ispras.ru (bran.ispras.ru. [83.149.199.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w62-v6si2645666lfk.223.2018.05.17.13.53.50 for ; Thu, 17 May 2018 13:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 23:53:05 +0300 (MSK) From: Alexander Monakov Subject: Re: [4.11 Regression] 64-bit process gets AT_BASE in the first 4 GB if exec'ed from 32-bit process In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <82328ad006ebacb399d04d638f8dad4a@ispras.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: izbyshev@ispras.ru, Dmitry Safonov , Thomas Gleixner , Cyrill Gorcunov , Borislav Petkov , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Linux-MM On Thu, 17 May 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > It's definitely not intended. Can you confirm that the problem still > exists in 4.16? I have some vague recollection that this was a known issue > that got fixed, and we could plausibly just be missing a backport. I could reproduce it on 4.16.0 on my laptop. Alexander