linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
	 akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@lst.de, gkohli@codeaurora.org,
	 mingo@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix a crash in do_task_dead()
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 16:06:25 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1906301542410.1105@eggly.anvils> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddf9ee34-cd97-a62b-6e91-6b4511586339@kernel.dk>

On Wed, 5 Jun 2019, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> How about the following plan - if folks are happy with this sched patch,
> we can queue it up for 5.3. Once that is in, I'll kill the block change
> that special cases the polled task wakeup. For 5.2, we go with Oleg's
> patch for the swap case.

I just hit the do_task_dead() kernel BUG at kernel/sched/core.c:3463!
while heavy swapping on 5.2-rc7: it looks like Oleg's patch intended
for 5.2 was not signed off, and got forgotten.

I did hit the do_task_dead() BUG (but not at all easily) on early -rcs
before seeing Oleg's patch, then folded it in and and didn't hit the BUG
again; then just tried again without it, and luckily hit in a few hours.

So I can give it an enthusiastic
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
because it makes good sense to avoid the get/blk_wake/put overhead on
the asynch path anyway, even if it didn't work around a bug; but only
Half-Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
since I have not been exercising the synchronous path at all.

Hugh, requoting Oleg:

> 
> I don't understand this code at all but I am just curious, can we do
> something like incomplete patch below ?
> 
> Oleg.
> 
> --- x/mm/page_io.c
> +++ x/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -140,8 +140,10 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page, bool synchronous)
>  	unlock_page(page);
>  	WRITE_ONCE(bio->bi_private, NULL);
>  	bio_put(bio);
> -	blk_wake_io_task(waiter);
> -	put_task_struct(waiter);
> +	if (waiter) {
> +		blk_wake_io_task(waiter);
> +		put_task_struct(waiter);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  int generic_swapfile_activate(struct swap_info_struct *sis,
> @@ -398,11 +400,12 @@ int swap_readpage(struct page *page, boo
>  	 * Keep this task valid during swap readpage because the oom killer may
>  	 * attempt to access it in the page fault retry time check.
>  	 */
> -	get_task_struct(current);
> -	bio->bi_private = current;
>  	bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_READ, 0);
> -	if (synchronous)
> +	if (synchronous) {
>  		bio->bi_opf |= REQ_HIPRI;
> +		get_task_struct(current);
> +		bio->bi_private = current;
> +	}
>  	count_vm_event(PSWPIN);
>  	bio_get(bio);
>  	qc = submit_bio(bio);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-30 23:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-29 20:25 [PATCH] block: fix a crash in do_task_dead() Qian Cai
2019-05-29 20:31 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-30  8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 21:12   ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-03 12:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 12:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 16:09         ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-03 16:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 16:23       ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-05 15:04       ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-07 13:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-07 14:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-08  8:39             ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-10 13:13             ` Gaurav Kohli
2019-06-10 14:46               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-06-11  4:39                 ` Gaurav Kohli
2019-06-30 23:06         ` Hugh Dickins [this message]
2019-07-01 14:22           ` Jens Axboe
2019-07-02 22:06             ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-03 17:35               ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-03 17:44                 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-07-04 16:00                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-03 17:52                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-30 11:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-05-31 21:10   ` Jens Axboe
2019-07-04 16:03 ` [PATCH] swap_readpage: avoid blk_wake_io_task() if !synchronous Oleg Nesterov
2019-07-04 19:32   ` Andrew Morton
2019-07-04 21:15     ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.11.1906301542410.1105@eggly.anvils \
    --to=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).