From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95675C433E0 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 05:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3835B2072A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 05:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="c1aDkf3N" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3835B2072A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8CE7C8D00AD; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 87EF38D00AA; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:25:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 794DD8D00AD; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:25:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0121.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.121]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D778D00AA for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 01:25:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin26.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088A33627 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 05:25:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77104491660.26.wool98_3d02f5526f92 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F211804B647 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 05:25:49 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: wool98_3d02f5526f92 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5421 Received: from mail-qk1-f196.google.com (mail-qk1-f196.google.com [209.85.222.196]) by imf29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 05:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-f196.google.com with SMTP id b79so32502195qkg.9 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 22:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Q88G6sppSxIX0pplwKPE04Ypo1Vd7dthljabY9nsEyY=; b=c1aDkf3N1oirRr4hEjjSjDfKhY6HLj9eJttmIu2Zh4YiBtsYG9vO6/uKfwRucL4I7R n2h84v4SMqNOnLTrc/lmWb6QE89nkwunpI0oW9RatURybcfZH4HE+Q2cehx7TW3q0rUb vNTJLMrkyzRQpoJtrJZM1+FqoEsBYN0NvFHXF8exk5PbDSwm0ScJ2KKG1QVfR5OK3ltL kOafCVTIDWPLbmBc21pOmMscRXKH5rH2pkRXJyjivN9nRy7nd+gdqEoejrRvFL2Xhq8f FFWtGXMC/ybACTFbTlJhCX0Eo2Ihvx2BtkVfpVm/KWqGNcUAfD0xqxFcmOqZ2WwAF13+ DlXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Q88G6sppSxIX0pplwKPE04Ypo1Vd7dthljabY9nsEyY=; b=qa0y4LS94LcaUgmkWH9UrBc0sd4h/yohKF7bXKdi877mAdTfNZhzSmjGiQA5Tthpfa BFVtuhYn9BjI/RRg4F14gd7KBNDAj8rTSrCefw5JKLNXs8ykuH0wmvn2C9ll/b0NDLvS Ph+MsZzfulLDP3IugrfBAgUq8q/JtZzRs+pMGOyAyVpngBSRYaUgLhuJS1jqS6563uKX 3aQgGZtCRhl4vjTOYmlZ2qXyqmi2hQvhUek7PPgTEdbs9t5WZyYQV4xFFeVweI6f2Bhr +1ey5tnz1kybqxhIU2f/8bOgtCjyPXoumGoEe3Y/YTKN0FDU8tZrS/X4nAzBqxDJFxDB zhvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UClJ4RtuWv4hENZXyyAaudMg6JHor11xhgvnvJ5oj06ZKEiSG 0XzPzYfVEJ8C+UetPHGLqpDteQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2XEQW+vlnz4WBQHArLHqV+Fwe3Ix1H14p3IpuTokxVzcUWNZ0wmISRzmPl0gd8Fl92/Br9A== X-Received: by 2002:a37:8f07:: with SMTP id r7mr10765958qkd.480.1596345948371; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 22:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggly.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g129sm16074916qkb.39.2020.08.01.22.25.45 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Aug 2020 22:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 22:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@eggly.anvils To: Randy Dunlap cc: Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Chris Down , Al Viro , Matthew Wilcox , Amir Goldstein , Jeff Layton , Johannes Weiner , Tejun Heo , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] tmpfs: support 64-bit inums per-sb fix In-Reply-To: <4d2af3f7-eb4f-6313-1719-b1c532c9a96d@infradead.org> Message-ID: References: <8b23758d0c66b5e2263e08baf9c4b6a7565cbd8f.1594661218.git.chris@chrisdown.name> <4d2af3f7-eb4f-6313-1719-b1c532c9a96d@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D3F211804B647 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 8/1/20 7:37 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > Expanded Chris's Documentation and Kconfig help on tmpfs inode64. > > TMPFS_INODE64 still there, still default N, but writing down its very > > limited limitation does make me wonder again if we want the option. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins > > --- > > Andrew, please fold into tmpfs-support-64-bit-inums-per-sb.patch later. > > > > Randy, you're very active on Documentation and linux-next: may I ask you > > please to try applying this patch to latest, and see if tmpfs.rst comes > > out looking right to you? I'm an old dog still stuck in the days of > > Hi Hugh, > It looks fine. Thank you so much, Randy. > > > tmpfs.txt, hoping to avoid new tricks for a while. Thanks! (Bonus > > points if you can explain what the "::" on line 122 is about. I started > > out reading Documentation/doc-guide/sphinx.rst, but... got diverted. > > Perhaps I should ask Mauro or Jon, but turning for help first to you.) > > That's the correct file. Around line 216, it says: > > * For inserting fixed width text blocks (for code examples, use case > examples, etc.), use ``::`` for anything that doesn't really benefit > from syntax highlighting, especially short snippets. Use > ``.. code-block:: `` for longer code blocks that benefit > from highlighting. For a short snippet of code embedded in the text, use \`\`. > > > so it's just for a (short) code example block, fixed font... Bonus points awarded, thanks...ish. I'll have to look around for more examples of where that's done, and I think it'll only make real sense to me, when I'm further along, producing the proper output, then seeing how bad something looks without the "::". Thanks again, Hugh