From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BEDC433DB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF7122D6E for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6EF7122D6E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DFBE36B00FF; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:35:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DABFF6B0101; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:35:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CC1196B0102; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:35:34 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0135.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.135]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B744A6B00FF for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:35:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCC6362D for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77673028188.20.glue31_1c08821274dc Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED5180C07AB for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: glue31_1c08821274dc X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5736 Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (mail-oi1-f171.google.com [209.85.167.171]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id s75so1225872oih.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:35:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=0hmHryJfbf/XT9z825YcWQkO0BUnqygh/hnGzawmTrY=; b=ulzDg2IasU4VsBB0KyNVFZxes1bxHLiVNF/IhndXx0/HSPvfKmMt3cBCtUJHxjWu7w C0Q4SrWmKapNA8Wsr861GbH/g+uH75/m+kXBeGchxMklBe9rYzJZ6KgP2F9YQLuV6duU vZ94xR1xktoGZvvSxbqw3Ibo78we4eI6TXvJR8MEWFmQV3C/J66qSjiMRj8NaCNr8DYk 811SPpXl0e5iMH97feJnxm8ANn4PHHtVr+UfeqAho94TMgvDHDc3/iVOnhMw+I+4LLAl F1K/SsUTZ7C2+/VJf5icCjpptLOW34t2RQ0wjVlZtNcliYZcL0Wzg1CH1ooUpox46P00 amcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=0hmHryJfbf/XT9z825YcWQkO0BUnqygh/hnGzawmTrY=; b=Xf3eaYQV8uRw83hvD9kZLQvt+FeUF/ptRnQwN6z8LDbX+HdIMz1S/wun3CvyeOunna op2lo+EFbShgx0O8nbg2MTBk/JdWfyr0Msgn/02oh48DuelhwyltwpLI9TUCHwASd1Jg MONLWPX99oBl88/Ck/iS0fb1Or4DFwkbUk0ul/l3FgotZuct/FtUScY+GaJEMCD6M1Ve vwG2l581aRRyF+//EWruimzjatyiCjICbKHmHmBTODsckr/5XvWuSybvxixydgOiS9Pi 6YDeCJiDz3/mrhD5CNDJzIxEC5qQxrsI6GYeIRMOvdnzSMJhd3paGQaOrpRKGxZ9NH1p aA0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532LjXQoBmWphTf5LFH231CTSS5Wi+8YTmy5e8wKrCbUZ/5WEgD5 FfVOqMVm6tQJ4I/krv40oEvafg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxh2ibuVi7SjpkQuIeZu+8VClJigP7sAZUgiz6tfGiUGShnMJKty2zcyq7qxIorFLjLb1r5BA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:d406:: with SMTP id l6mr1209979oig.26.1609882533067; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from eggly.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e12sm105626otp.25.2021.01.05.13.35.31 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:35:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:35:20 -0800 (PST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@eggly.anvils To: Qian Cai cc: Shakeel Butt , Alex Shi , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Tejun Heo , Hugh Dickins , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Daniel Jordan , Matthew Wilcox , Johannes Weiner , kernel test robot , Linux MM , LKML , Cgroups , Joonsoo Kim , Wei Yang , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , alexander.duyck@gmail.com, kernel test robot , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Yang Shi Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 00/19] per memcg lru lock In-Reply-To: <49be27f2652d4658f80c95bea171142c35513761.camel@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1604566549-62481-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <49be27f2652d4658f80c95bea171142c35513761.camel@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 5 Jan 2021, Qian Cai wrote: > On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 11:42 -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 11:30 AM Qian Cai wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-11-05 at 16:55 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > > > > This version rebase on next/master 20201104, with much of Johannes's > > > > Acks and some changes according to Johannes comments. And add a new patch > > > > v21-0006-mm-rmap-stop-store-reordering-issue-on-page-mapp.patch to support > > > > v21-0007. > > > > > > > > This patchset followed 2 memcg VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_PAGE patches which were > > > > added to -mm tree yesterday. > > > > > > > > Many thanks for line by line review by Hugh Dickins, Alexander Duyck and > > > > Johannes Weiner. > > > > > > Given the troublesome history of this patchset, and had been put into linux- > > > next > > > recently, as well as it touched both THP and mlock. Is it a good idea to > > > suspect > > > this patchset introducing some races and a spontaneous crash with some mlock > > > memory presume? > > > > This has already been merged into the linus tree. Were you able to get > > a similar crash on the latest upstream kernel as well? > > No, I seldom test the mainline those days. Before the vacations, I have tested > linux-next up to something like 12/10 which did not include this patchset IIRC > and never saw any crash like this. I am still trying to figure out how to > reproduce it fast, so I can try a revert to confirm. This patchset went into mmotm 2020-11-16-16-23, so probably linux-next on 2020-11-17: you'll have had three trouble-free weeks testing with it in, so it's not a likely suspect. I haven't looked yet at your report, to think of a more likely suspect: will do. Hugh