From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-24.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF4CC433ED for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:13:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5856023B for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:13:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB5856023B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1D52D6B0081; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:13:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 184926B0082; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:13:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id F196F6B0083; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:13:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0048.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.48]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80E96B0081 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:13:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5D58158 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:13:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77981419362.03.5FFD12E Received: from mail-qt1-f175.google.com (mail-qt1-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797E1138 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 21:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f175.google.com with SMTP id f12so23440qtq.4 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:13:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=7ZNFgcsyvkRXWIbvwYMY03RQW5khQN/vbd/frFG/nUU=; b=s08LYvlJvhn6Snkowhi+e/QiTlMojStP5ZCr99DF6cd0W7h+JSpge4UyYmTjdxJlDE vK2Ee5fYWroXeMzqQ9lpiz/UeppjHK+QwiHN44goCfrX5dS9Dv6sjSHKkhvI6k9FtSh5 utgLT/c5JquNraVvUVVBIk0pGvd/8JEboRMiTZNmc4tcXQEoNvxZYXltIY7JiBsU1ZDx F20oI7K97o7OslxraIKh5/b6FE3/TIdjpsaCuRDRPzL/f+pUilTSrq6vWA9rhIEgUmAU AKspx/xL86InAzl7u695FPCDrHMQ9JC7OnbUn7DqgnwMQQJQxoVRRFR6FqGS/b3EybPU 8ghA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=7ZNFgcsyvkRXWIbvwYMY03RQW5khQN/vbd/frFG/nUU=; b=ERP8vBU2Xl6joUxnDgvN1QptSWF8ZjxFEE5PZpqyXD/bNWCV3q93WtigqWfTW2pjlf +BKROdFMRzivp0aSdq/mI1oDJZfHRRFfdFvwl4xyRglLmf9Ds+f+eF9YMP0vmLCWShxP sauNsYvGyMvowI62Tl8c+Fc3rjwlEoZxsTUAqbojioFVUJJSoXSKwhHO9Uc4xv2CvI8F oBVL3IcCWH6zKYsTbrpmLFHF8KsK06SrjN+aekyLGtxLfZjf4+QcVHsepqcoaWwGRVMF mNErMPxo+2YkCIarvV0CHYkAW0e1h3fZ3RW1ryieFVAzX6IioB6IQU7C8pfa3i9RRlQU tsLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ytWagbRjvwVMnfxlVoSB7WpPtHhxxtGi0z05R/CGK56BTTn/f q8O8xeO9NtRBRzTpOHq/AWy2Ug== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypuvcI13xS3gv2XogUYnau5xzu0OLfJoKlAsPJGfjyyA9wWQZV+IqmclZEIKYhTdv+YWlbSA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5510:: with SMTP id j16mr4224125qtq.339.1617225180064; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggly.attlocal.net (172-10-233-147.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.10.233.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm2396778qkk.5.2021.03.31.14.12.58 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:12:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@eggly.anvils To: Yang Shi cc: Shakeel Butt , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , kernel test robot , Stephen Rothwell , Roman Gushchin , Kirill Tkhai , Vlastimil Babka , Dave Chinner , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , LKML , Linux Memory Management List , lkp@lists.01.org, kernel test robot Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] mm: vmscan: fix shrinker_rwsem in free_shrinker_info() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LSU 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 797E1138 X-Stat-Signature: 7b9388ofhzgcbxi8tcm6e9h1sqssoyob Received-SPF: none (google.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf12; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail-qt1-f175.google.com; client-ip=209.85.160.175 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617225180-472345 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Yang Shi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 6:54 AM Shakeel Butt wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:44 PM Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > > > > Lockdep warns mm/vmscan.c: suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! > > > when free_shrinker_info() is called from mem_cgroup_css_free(): there it > > > is called with no locking, whereas alloc_shrinker_info() calls it with > > > down_write of shrinker_rwsem - which seems appropriate. Rearrange that > > > so free_shrinker_info() can manage the shrinker_rwsem for itself. > > > > > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210317140615.GB28839@xsang-OptiPlex-9020 > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins > > > Cc: Yang Shi > > > --- > > > Sorry, I've made no attempt to work out precisely where in the series > > > the locking went missing, nor tried to fit this in as a fix on top of > > > mm-vmscan-add-shrinker_info_protected-helper.patch > > > which Oliver reported (and which you notated in mmotm's "series" file). > > > This patch just adds the fix to the end of the series, after > > > mm-vmscan-shrink-deferred-objects-proportional-to-priority.patch > > > > The patch "mm: vmscan: add shrinker_info_protected() helper" replaces > > rcu_dereference_protected(shrinker_info, true) with > > rcu_dereference_protected(shrinker_info, > > lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem)). > > > > I think we don't really need shrinker_rwsem in free_shrinker_info() > > which is called from css_free(). The bits of the map have already been > > 'reparented' in css_offline. I think we can remove > > lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem) for free_shrinker_info(). > > Thanks, Hugh and Shakeel. I missed the report. > > I think Shakeel is correct, shrinker_rwsem is not required in css_free > path so Shakeel's proposal should be able to fix it. Yes, looking at it again, I am sure that Shakeel is right, and that my patch was overkill - no need for shrinker_rwsem there. Whether it's RCU-safe to free the info there, I have not reviewed at all: but shrinker_rwsem would not help even if there were an issue. > I prepared a patch: Unsigned, white-space damaged, so does not apply. > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > index 64bf07cc20f2..7348c26d4cac 100644 > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > @@ -251,7 +251,12 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > for_each_node(nid) { > pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid]; > - info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid); > + /* > + * Don't use shrinker_info_protected() helper since > + * free_shrinker_info() could be called by css_free() > + * without holding shrinker_rwsem. > + */ Just because I mis-inferred from the use of shrinker_info_protected() that shrinker_rwsem was needed here, is no reason to add that comment: imagine how unhelpfully bigger the kernel source would be if we added a comment everywhere I had misunderstood something! > + info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true); > kvfree(info); > rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL); > } That does it, but I bikeshedded with myself in the encyclopaedic rcupdate.h, and decided rcu_replace_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL, true) would be best. But now see that patch won't fit so well into your series, and I can't spend more time writing up a justification for it. I think Andrew should simply delete my fix patch from his queue, and edit out the @@ -232,7 +239,7 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgrou for_each_node(nid) { pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid]; - info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true); + info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid); kvfree(info); rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL); } hunk from your mm-vmscan-add-shrinker_info_protected-helper.patch which will then restore free_shrinker_info() to what you propose above. Thanks, Hugh