From: Vlastimil Babka <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slub: reinitialize random sequence cache on slab object update
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:53:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
On 1/30/20 12:17 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> From: Vijayanand Jitta <email@example.com>
> Random sequence cache is precomputed during slab object creation
> based up on the object size and no of objects per slab. These could
> be changed when flags like SLAB_STORE_USER, SLAB_POISON are updated
> from sysfs. So when shuffle_freelist is called during slab_alloc it
> uses updated object count to access the precomputed random sequence
> cache. This could result in incorrect access of the random sequence
> cache which could further result in slab corruption. Fix this by
> reinitializing the random sequence cache up on slab object update.
> A sample panic trace when write to slab_store_user was attempted.
A more complete oops report would have been better, e.g. if anyone was googling
it, to find this patch.
Also I was checking where else calculate_sizes() is called and found
order_store(). So if somebody changes (especially increases) the order,
shouldn't the reinitialization also be done?
This is even more nasty as it doesn't seem to require that no objects exist.
Also there is no synchronization against concurrent allocations/frees? Gasp.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-30 10:18 [PATCH] mm: slub: reinitialize random sequence cache on slab object update vjitta
2020-01-30 11:17 ` vjitta
2020-02-27 16:53 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-03-05 5:48 ` vjitta
2020-03-05 12:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-01-30 18:28 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-01-31 6:39 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2020-02-03 6:57 ` Vijayanand Jitta
2020-02-20 5:12 ` vjitta
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).