From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BC9C432BE for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B4360E09 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:04:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 38B4360E09 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7CD3E6B006C; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 755EA6B0072; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:04:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5F5BB6B0073; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:04:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0216.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.216]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412ED6B006C for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 00:04:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3561824999B for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:04:01 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78483229482.10.2914598 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988C96013014 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:04:00 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10078"; a="277016753" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="277016753" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2021 21:03:58 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,327,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="505156435" Received: from fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.84]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2021 21:03:58 -0700 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by fmsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:03:57 -0700 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:03:50 +0800 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.215]) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.215]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.010; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:03:50 +0800 From: "Ma, XinjianX" To: "legion@kernel.org" , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" CC: lkp , "linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "christian.brauner@ubuntu.com" , "containers@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "ebiederm@xmission.com" , "jannh@google.com" , "keescook@chromium.org" , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "oleg@redhat.com" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/9] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE on top of ucounts Thread-Topic: [PATCH v11 5/9] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE on top of ucounts Thread-Index: AQHXkxd6jQPRg5rF3UWHcji9NSI54Q== Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 04:03:50 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 988C96013014 X-Stat-Signature: 77xhyoioubaybikiaomo6tknpmojaq5x Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=intel.com (policy=none); spf=none (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of xinjianx.ma@intel.com has no SPF policy when checking 134.134.136.31) smtp.mailfrom=xinjianx.ma@intel.com X-HE-Tag: 1629173040-34743 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Alexey, When lkp team run kernel selftests, we found after these series of patches,= testcase mqueue: mq_perf_tests in kselftest failed with following message.=20 If you confirm and fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com ``` # selftests: mqueue: mq_perf_tests # # Initial system state: # Using queue path: /mq_perf_tests # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(soft): 819200 # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(hard): 819200 # Maximum Message Size: 8192 # Maximum Queue Size: 10 # Nice value: 0 # # Adjusted system state for testing: # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(soft): (unlimited) # RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE(hard): (unlimited) # Maximum Message Size: 16777216 # Maximum Queue Size: 65530 # Nice value: -20 # Continuous mode: (disabled) # CPUs to pin: 3 # ./mq_perf_tests: mq_open() at 296: Too many open files not ok 2 selftests: mqueue: mq_perf_tests # exit=3D1 ``` =20 Test env: rootfs: debian-10 gcc version: 9 ------ Thanks=20 Ma Xinjian