From: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@au1.ibm.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
Cc: "Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Frederic Barrat" <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>,
"Andrew Donnellan" <ajd@linux.ibm.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Vishal Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Anton Blanchard" <anton@ozlabs.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Mahesh Salgaonkar" <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
"Anju T Sudhakar" <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Hari Bathini" <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Greg Kurz" <groug@kaod.org>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
"Alexey Kardashevskiy" <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/27] ocxl: Add functions to map/unmap LPC memory
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 13:39:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d8c4cbeb65ad87d6ca5a3867bbd94852f8a404f1.camel@au1.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203124942.00003b68@Huawei.com>
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 12:49 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:46:35 +1100
> Alastair D'Silva <alastair@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> >
> > Add functions to map/unmap LPC memory
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c | 4 +++
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c | 50
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 3 ++
> > include/misc/ocxl.h | 18 +++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > index c8e19bfb5ef9..fb0c3b6f8312 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
> > @@ -568,6 +568,10 @@ static int read_afu_lpc_memory_info(struct
> > pci_dev *dev,
> > afu->special_purpose_mem_size =
> > total_mem_size - lpc_mem_size;
> > }
> > +
> > + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Probed LPC memory of %#llx bytes and
> > special purpose memory of %#llx bytes\n",
> > + afu->lpc_mem_size, afu->special_purpose_mem_size);
> > +
>
> If we are being fussy, this block has nothing todo with the rest of
> the patch
> so we should be seeing it here.
Agreed
>
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> > index 2531c6cf19a0..98611faea219 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/core.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,55 @@ static void unmap_mmio_areas(struct ocxl_afu
> > *afu)
> > release_fn_bar(afu->fn, afu->config.global_mmio_bar);
> > }
> >
> > +int ocxl_afu_map_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(afu->fn->dev.parent);
> > +
> > + if ((afu->config.lpc_mem_size + afu-
> > >config.special_purpose_mem_size) == 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + afu->lpc_base_addr = ocxl_link_lpc_map(afu->fn->link, dev);
> > + if (afu->lpc_base_addr == 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (afu->config.lpc_mem_size) {
>
> I was happy with the explicit check on 0 above, but we should be
> consistent. Either
> we make use of 0 == false, or we don't and explicitly check vs 0.
>
> Hence
>
> if (afu->config.pc_mem_size != 0) {
>
> here or
>
> if (!(afu->config.pc_mem_size + afu-
> >config.special_purpose_mem_size))
> return 0;
>
> above.
This feels a bit niggly, but sure, changed to a '> 0' check.
>
> > + afu->lpc_res.start = afu->lpc_base_addr + afu-
> > >config.lpc_mem_offset;
> > + afu->lpc_res.end = afu->lpc_res.start + afu-
> > >config.lpc_mem_size - 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (afu->config.special_purpose_mem_size) {
> > + afu->special_purpose_res.start = afu->lpc_base_addr +
> > + afu-
> > >config.special_purpose_mem_offset;
> > + afu->special_purpose_res.end = afu-
> > >special_purpose_res.start +
> > + afu-
> > >config.special_purpose_mem_size - 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_afu_map_lpc_mem);
> > +
> > +struct resource *ocxl_afu_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
> > +{
> > + return &afu->lpc_res;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_afu_lpc_mem);
> > +
> > +static void unmap_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_dev *dev = to_pci_dev(afu->fn->dev.parent);
> > +
> > + if (afu->lpc_res.start || afu->special_purpose_res.start) {
> > + void *link = afu->fn->link;
> > +
> > + ocxl_link_lpc_release(link, dev);
> > +
> > + afu->lpc_res.start = 0;
> > + afu->lpc_res.end = 0;
> > + afu->special_purpose_res.start = 0;
> > + afu->special_purpose_res.end = 0;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu, u8 afu_idx, struct
> > pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > int rc;
> > @@ -251,6 +300,7 @@ static int configure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu,
> > u8 afu_idx, struct pci_dev *dev)
> >
> > static void deconfigure_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
> > {
> > + unmap_lpc_mem(afu);
>
> Hmm. This breaks the existing balance between configure_afu and
> deconfigure_afu.
>
> Given comments below on why we don't do map_lpc_mem in the afu bring
> up
> (as it's a shared operation) it seems to me that we should be doing
> this
> outside of the afu deconfigure. Perhaps ocxl_function_close is
> appropriate?
> I don't know this infrastructure well enough to be sure.
>
> If it does need to be here, then a comment to give more info on
> why would be great!
>
Sure, I've added a comment in unmap_lpc_mem explaining that lpc_release
only releases the memory on the link when the last consumer calls
release.
It's in deconfigure_afu as the LPC memory is registered and reported
per-AFU (even though it has to be allocated all at once across the
link).
> > unmap_mmio_areas(afu);
> > reclaim_afu_pasid(afu);
> > reclaim_afu_actag(afu);
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > index 20b417e00949..9f4b47900e62 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ struct ocxl_afu {
> > void __iomem *global_mmio_ptr;
> > u64 pp_mmio_start;
> > void *private;
> > + u64 lpc_base_addr; /* Covers both LPC & special purpose memory
> > */
> > + struct resource lpc_res;
> > + struct resource special_purpose_res;
> > };
> >
> > enum ocxl_context_status {
> > diff --git a/include/misc/ocxl.h b/include/misc/ocxl.h
> > index 06dd5839e438..6f7c02f0d5e3 100644
> > --- a/include/misc/ocxl.h
> > +++ b/include/misc/ocxl.h
> > @@ -212,6 +212,24 @@ int ocxl_irq_set_handler(struct ocxl_context
> > *ctx, int irq_id,
> >
> > // AFU Metadata
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Map the LPC system & special purpose memory for an AFU
> > + *
> > + * Do not call this during device discovery, as there may me
> > multiple
> > + * devices on a link, and the memory is mapped for the whole link,
> > not
> > + * just one device. It should only be called after all devices
> > have
> > + * registered their memory on the link.
> > + *
> > + * afu: The AFU that has the LPC memory to map
> Run kernel-doc over these files and fix all the errors + warnings.
>
Ok.
> @afu: ..
>
> and missing function name etc.
>
>
> > + */
> > +extern int ocxl_afu_map_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Get the physical address range of LPC memory for an AFU
> > + * afu: The AFU associated with the LPC memory
> > + */
> > +extern struct resource *ocxl_afu_lpc_mem(struct ocxl_afu *afu);
> > +
> > /**
> > * Get a pointer to the config for an AFU
> > *
--
Alastair D'Silva
Open Source Developer
Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia
mob: 0423 762 819
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-19 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 3:46 [PATCH v2 00/27] Add support for OpenCAPI SCM devices Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/27] memory_hotplug: Add a bounds check to __add_pages Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/27] nvdimm: remove prototypes for nonexistent functions Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 4:47 ` Andrew Donnellan
2019-12-04 0:10 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-23 21:49 ` Dan Williams
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/27] powerpc: Add OPAL calls for LPC memory alloc/release Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/27] mm/memory_hotplug: Allow check_hotplug_memory_addressable to be called from drivers Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/27] powerpc: Map & release OpenCAPI LPC memory Alastair D'Silva
2020-01-09 14:41 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-01-21 6:46 ` Andrew Donnellan
2020-01-21 7:11 ` Greg Kurz
2020-02-14 11:09 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-02-18 23:44 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/27] ocxl: Tally up the LPC memory on a link & allow it to be mapped Alastair D'Silva
2020-01-09 14:48 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-02-03 12:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 0:01 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/27] ocxl: Add functions to map/unmap LPC memory Alastair D'Silva
2020-01-09 14:49 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-02-03 12:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 2:39 ` Alastair D'Silva [this message]
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/27] ocxl: Save the device serial number in ocxl_fn Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 12:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 4:03 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/27] ocxl: Free detached contexts in ocxl_context_detach_all() Alastair D'Silva
2020-01-09 14:54 ` Frederic Barrat
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/27] nvdimm: Add driver for OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 5:05 ` Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 13:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 4:40 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add register addresses & status values to header Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Read the capability registers & wait for device ready Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 13:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 4:46 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add support for Admin commands Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 14:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 5:00 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add support for near storage commands Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 14:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 4:54 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Register a character device for userspace to interact with Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Implement the Read Error Log command Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-05 3:42 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-05 19:34 ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 17/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add controller dump IOCTLs Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 18/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add an IOCTL to report controller statistics Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 19/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Forward events to userspace Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 20/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add an IOCTL to request controller health & perf data Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 21/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Support firmware update via sysfs Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 22/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Implement the heartbeat command Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 15:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 5:02 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 23/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Add debug IOCTLs Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 24/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Implement Overwrite Alastair D'Silva
2020-02-03 15:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-02-19 5:13 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 25/27] nvdimm/ocxl: Expose SMART data via ndctl Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-16 0:15 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 26/27] powerpc: Enable OpenCAPI Storage Class Memory driver on bare metal Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 4:54 ` Andrew Donnellan
2019-12-03 4:57 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:46 ` [PATCH v2 27/27] MAINTAINERS: Add myself & nvdimm/ocxl to ocxl Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 3:50 ` [PATCH v2 00/27] Add support for OpenCAPI SCM devices Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-03 4:01 ` Alastair D'Silva
2019-12-03 12:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-04 0:15 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d8c4cbeb65ad87d6ca5a3867bbd94852f8a404f1.camel@au1.ibm.com \
--to=alastair@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).