From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f69.google.com (mail-it0-f69.google.com [209.85.214.69]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B496B000A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:59:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-f69.google.com with SMTP id g6-v6so4637148iti.7 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:59:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com (aserp2130.oracle.com. [141.146.126.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i32-v6si12901058jak.68.2018.07.12.06.59.20 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/39 v7] PTI support for x86-32 References: <1531308586-29340-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <1225b274-534b-cc32-54eb-aba89efba494@mageia.org> From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:59:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1225b274-534b-cc32-54eb-aba89efba494@mageia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thomas Backlund , Linus Torvalds , Joerg Roedel Cc: Jiri Kosina , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Peter Anvin , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andrew Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg Kroah-Hartman On 07/11/2018 03:57 PM, Thomas Backlund wrote: > Den 2018-07-11 kl. 20:28, skrev Jiri Kosina: >> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >>> It's the testing that worries me most. Pretty much no developers run >>> 32-bit any more, and I'd be most worried about the odd interactions >>> that >>> might be hw-specific. Some crazy EFI mapping setup or the similar odd >>> case that simply requires a particular configuration or setup. >>> >>> But I guess those issues will never be found until we just spring this >>> all on the unsuspecting public. >> >> FWIW we shipped Joerg's 32bit KAISER kernel out to our 32bit users >> (on old >> product where we still support it) on Apr 25th already (and some issues >> have been identified since then because of that). So it (or its port to >> 3.0, to be more precise :p) already did receive some crowd-testing. >> > > And Mageia has had v2 since February 13th patched into 4.14 -longterm, > then updated to v3 at March 5th, and updated to v4 at March 19th and > been running that since then (since v5 is rebased on v4.17 we stayed > with v4) > > > So, here is another "lets merge it upstream" vote :) I had a quick boot test for Xen (PV and HVM) and they both looked OK. I didn't boot all the way to login prompt but that's most likely due to issues in my environment -- I haven't tried this image in a year or so and my other setup is offline right now. -boris