From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B8CC433E1 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D1020720 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 36D1020720 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D43706B0029; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CF4AC6B002D; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:23:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BE27A6B002E; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:23:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0201.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.201]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96786B0029 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 12:23:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9F0180AD820 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:12 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76993655424.25.baby60_500fd1526e8a Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CE51804E3A9 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:12 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: baby60_500fd1526e8a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4567 Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0023.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.23]) by imf32.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EF6180A813A; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: eggs64_191235726e8a X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3163 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 16:23:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] spi: davinci: Remove uninitialized_var() usage From: Joe Perches To: Kees Cook , Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Desaulniers , Linus Torvalds , Miguel Ojeda , Alexander Potapenko , Andy Whitcroft , x86@kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:23:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: <202007020839.545A571CA4@keescook> References: <20200620033007.1444705-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20200620033007.1444705-9-keescook@chromium.org> <20200701203920.GC3776@sirena.org.uk> <202007020819.318824DA@keescook> <20200702152335.GJ4483@sirena.org.uk> <202007020839.545A571CA4@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 22CE51804E3A9 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, 2020-07-02 at 08:42 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:23:35PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 08:21:40AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:39:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Please copy maintainers on patches :( > > > Hi! Sorry about that; the CC list was giant, so I had opted for using > > > subsystem mailing lists where possible. > > > > If you're going to err in a direction there I'd err in the direction of > > CCing the people not the list - I only saw this since I was looking for > > something else, I don't normally see stuff in the mailing list folder. > > Yeah, I've gotten conflicting feedback on treewide changes: > - please CC me on only the one patch, I don't want to see everything else > - please CC me on the whole series, I want the full context for the change > > I opted toward "CC me on this series", but then I get stuck when the CC > is giant. I think I may switch back to individual CCs for specific > patches, and point people to lore if they want greater context. (lore > didn't exist before...) IMO: For a patch series that spans multiple subsystems, each patch should always CC any specific subsystem maintainers.. A good trick would be to use the cover letter message-id: and have each individual patch in the series reference the cover letter id below the --- line so any reviewer doesn't have to find the in-reply-to: message id and then reference the lore link. Something like: --- For complete series see: https://lore.kernel.org/r/