From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE52AC00140 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 813FB940009; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7C32A940007; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 664F9940009; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584F3940007 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:31:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A88408E8 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:31:03 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79729488006.31.0121794 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2645400CE for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1658845860; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gr7dw0e3vkHCOc9kW8UEU5CieYdDfZtmZu7Qeg3pxlU=; b=cvrR5GIn8DgNAJxePWXnBUMEtjcvhO4ZKiYprt1tOyG0b5gQyLOWHfVFQ/hb5P3JXYNPBL wbgHvuUzLq9vboYv6FlJvFCuSl2rmy7GC1MEhJd5f6zFiYKrahrI4NYSHbmeRnSdcQLWQ8 Q4Mtz8fU5ALtCjmabmKsFyjFM0Kg1q8= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-177-QJ8hs6xiP32b0HZteTUrkQ-1; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:30:59 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QJ8hs6xiP32b0HZteTUrkQ-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id bg6-20020a05600c3c8600b003a03d5d19e4so5468776wmb.1 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:30:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:organization:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gr7dw0e3vkHCOc9kW8UEU5CieYdDfZtmZu7Qeg3pxlU=; b=rKHEytsm1DNSwNeAyG9vyR3R7uozy69aD6xH0wo8+SGSDrdoPK/SWeMm3I/uI3CiAo lKmCXoXuc8HCp/oLXzV0HBpAEhgfp7bg3OZGiasE5MyOhnaJUBoG2lWnBmP4fTKqAp1O kd/fiYfkpngdV2Zvu9Gy9sj443z7hI1Dhz3OP1A0huxbVxHQth7pJLLNATkGGQGWyRjt i+UW4rv012LmCEBg7aXFdz2FSHpgND1dg5Z6ER3y1y4TojGCnUD58eVS+K9ZKV/HOlj/ iilrg9YRoKb+Ky7yuIEBTaJFVsxqkKWwrMTLYXHQ1zLtVJJi0kxf6R2gqgjqokrV1hf4 Qs7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8yTYJUS/Cnms3tScbYrpsDRzBfVTQ+WeKkPYi5TFkDnfqL6AF9 Jrxx++oRSAzNTHdYrW57Cg1d4krICFJKB8nDh2KmJhI+ydn68EUOgtr1FQcDgKAErTrFTH4BChS ZQbzJXdndCf8= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3cc:0:b0:3a3:8ec:d69 with SMTP id t12-20020a7bc3cc000000b003a308ec0d69mr25694595wmj.78.1658845857805; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v8k0/X43EXk3DBk+CZ8uyrXpNOynm2gCY+Qrl/OkI5JufZYaMneweAdNpBJGa8v5GHTMBxdg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c3cc:0:b0:3a3:8ec:d69 with SMTP id t12-20020a7bc3cc000000b003a308ec0d69mr25694552wmj.78.1658845857423; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c708:fe00:8ba4:5871:abc3:8a75? (p200300cbc708fe008ba45871abc38a75.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c708:fe00:8ba4:5871:abc3:8a75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v11-20020adfe4cb000000b0021e6b62fde2sm10429441wrm.59.2022.07.26.07.30.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 16:30:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 02/14] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Hansen , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andy Lutomirski , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Morton , Joerg Roedel , Ard Biesheuvel , Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , Mike Rapoport , marcelo.cerri@canonical.com, tim.gardner@canonical.com, khalid.elmously@canonical.com, philip.cox@canonical.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport References: <20220614120231.48165-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220614120231.48165-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <707ca113-c2a2-8fe2-a22c-5be13adc7bb4@intel.com> <7d664831-a78c-4a4f-5bd6-f0e04463ca7c@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1658845862; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GkVolKQjGeZcI334o1EaiGtwPUts5lhR3uUqDqfSvdA1Ro0qV4SFhXV3rg7y2d+lBBMjKI LcqRMqe+qpCBqBc7EYfZ8gvTzrbGNDZhB7cNqMaU2v9Yxh141vTOL4bR+wWDCoiXgCZ5DP PCbTzEyu7/UegxY4F4Q07i0ccos+Qro= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cvrR5GIn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1658845862; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=gr7dw0e3vkHCOc9kW8UEU5CieYdDfZtmZu7Qeg3pxlU=; b=YBTW4INxntGP8xOvZa7JOSSrkNVbZ4BgrzPxenkINa8ctzUPrSPQ8lxiuj4ToVwQR7xYAV xeB2jTZRcWVM7MYOk//7DIQeHSfy/STik+DEFKeVEQFcQrhdmxVwRmdU3rKCkv0Z0Ts92L LxJa9SL13XovJv4bWy9lzgP/B0YINHM= X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F2645400CE Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cvrR5GIn; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=none (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com has no SPF policy when checking 170.10.129.124) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com X-Stat-Signature: 9c4z8d9uugstnbzzanht4mghdg7mqgn9 X-HE-Tag: 1658845860-340951 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 25.07.22 14:53, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:38:57PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> The less core-MM code to handle unaccepted memory the better. Meaning, >> that any kind of additional pre-acceptance (in addition to what we have >> here) needs good justification. > > I actually mean to have a user interface to have the core code > pre-accept. I.e., interface to what will be already there anyway. > Ah, got it. The "issue" with ordinary prefaulting in user space is that you'll also end up zeroing the memory. But yeah, it should just accept a bunch of memory. > Or is that frowned upon too? I was assuming you'd want some additional interface that only accept memory without actually temporarily allocating it. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb