From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f200.google.com (mail-pf1-f200.google.com [209.85.210.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8346B000A for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 19:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pf1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b27-v6so28313098pfm.15 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l13-v6si18976145pgb.534.2018.10.17.16.17.14 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:17:14 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/27] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES system states References: <20181011151523.27101-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181011151523.27101-4-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20181017104137.GE22535@zn.tnic> <32da559b-7958-60db-e328-f0eb316e668e@infradead.org> <20181017225829.GA32023@zn.tnic> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:17:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181017225829.GA32023@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Yu-cheng Yu , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Andy Lutomirski , Balbir Singh , Cyrill Gorcunov , Dave Hansen , Eugene Syromiatnikov , Florian Weimer , "H.J. Lu" , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Mike Kravetz , Nadav Amit , Oleg Nesterov , Pavel Machek , Peter Zijlstra , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Vedvyas Shanbhogue On 10/17/18 3:58 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Would you mind explaining this request? (requirement?) >> Other than to say that it is the preference of some maintainers, >> please say Why it is preferred. >> >> and since the s above won't typically be the same length, >> it's not for variable name alignment, right? > > Searching the net a little, it shows you have asked that question > before. So what is it you really wanna know? OK, you have shown that your web search skills are better than mine. I asked what I really wanted to know. ta. -- ~Randy