From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7876C3526A for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777182251F for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2408520AbgLNRYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:24:41 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43910 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2408522AbgLNRYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:24:37 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AACC0617A7 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id j13so6950530pjz.3 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:23:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cg6Bq8u6T5dLgFu86otlHuVnE4BbKztYZ9gDn/MmCXc=; b=M/f24FvBVPavu1tTNzezOto0bS8sgtxaEDsDYCm3yKXZOjBEHMug6ph2ZN2jp/rAcQ 0uAAjoQGoGvG7mlHkdqoJ20q2OX/rgkx+RcG5KYoh4rUtzgAksgNRx/HGWTLPeykoeUM HNsvLfjZYGAaPTkJbX+yPO2qkw6UuG/pRLBPA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cg6Bq8u6T5dLgFu86otlHuVnE4BbKztYZ9gDn/MmCXc=; b=IswIZNhEYKLC1rJaWewx3s3KWGSKGpizxea+m+BWndWK1Fvx7axtWDyPh+KsZr1KXJ KO6arr4VfMBbx0Y+xMS7470+H6MvmJdSsQn7QBoo4ojbfIVtzLvD11mMFe+IAIxxi6RR LJsI4h/moYKfItw+oJHGAHxEgO+oHDAapZT+l3XZ2FukzmS956uMTXi2V9yEut9VwY1F trRpOB4hLez56w6D/kdlKduJ7RWk8gsm8cpcg12VYV8OIFD8hJLWwa8dmnNB0SQ7mvip TY/o/jvLcTq8/fe8VQbIvskocPhhRdUzj0NG4a/bWyVuSAWaYXf2wDKUeEMcvFjmay6a u7QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Go/SKK7z8PzvbBxTCA8elVKqYfDBaN3bLF6XH9wgezfljBXND PGsuMjFOvQQuupm2vWnLBoZJeg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzBFDAtXnY4SIfO2hMauHJDz6Ubh83KhYpJyoVJiaqsTbdWhwA9llolIS2fzSFnfZcuHDq/2A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:50a:: with SMTP id r10mr26452721pjz.103.1607966599913; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:23:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from tictac2.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:202:1:42b0:34ff:fe3d:58e6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm16013498pfh.142.2020.12.14.09.23.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:23:18 -0800 (PST) From: Douglas Anderson To: Ulf Hansson , Adrian Hunter Cc: Taniya Das , vbadigan@codeaurora.org, Stephen Boyd , Douglas Anderson , Bjorn Andersson , Andy Gross , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Actually set the actual clock Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:21:15 -0800 Message-Id: <20201214092048.v5.2.I7564620993acd4baa63fa0e3925ca879a86d3ee3@changeid> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog In-Reply-To: <20201214092048.v5.1.Iec3430c7d3c2a29262695edef7b82a14aaa567e5@changeid> References: <20201214092048.v5.1.Iec3430c7d3c2a29262695edef7b82a14aaa567e5@changeid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org The MSM SDHCI driver always set the "actual_clock" field to 0. It had a comment about it not being needed because we weren't using the standard SDHCI divider mechanism and we'd just fallback to "host->clock". However, it's still better to provide the actual clock. Why? 1. It will make timeout calculations slightly better. On one system I have, the eMMC requets 200 MHz (for HS400-ES) but actually gets 192 MHz. These are close, but why not get the more accurate one. 2. If things are seriously off in the clock driver and it's missing rates or picking the wrong rate (maybe it's rounding up instead of down), this will make it much more obvious what's going on. NOTE: we have to be a little careful here because the "actual_clock" field shouldn't include the multiplier that sdhci-msm needs internally. Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson --- Changes in v5: - Remove unused clock parameter. - Add a comment that we're stashing the requested rate. Changes in v4: - ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Actually set the actual clock") new for v4. drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c index 50beb407dbe9..f5669dc858d0 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c @@ -328,8 +328,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_v5_variant_writel_relaxed(u32 val, writel_relaxed(val, host->ioaddr + offset); } -static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, - unsigned int clock) +static unsigned int msm_get_clock_mult_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host) { struct mmc_ios ios = host->mmc->ios; /* @@ -342,8 +341,8 @@ static unsigned int msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_DDR52 || ios.timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400 || host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING) - clock *= 2; - return clock; + return 2; + return 1; } static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, @@ -354,14 +353,16 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_ios curr_ios = host->mmc->ios; struct clk *core_clk = msm_host->bulk_clks[0].clk; unsigned long achieved_rate; + unsigned int desired_rate; + unsigned int mult; int rc; - clock = msm_get_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(host, clock); - rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), clock); + mult = msm_get_clock_mult_for_bus_mode(host); + desired_rate = clock * mult; + rc = dev_pm_opp_set_rate(mmc_dev(host->mmc), desired_rate); if (rc) { pr_err("%s: Failed to set clock at rate %u at timing %d\n", - mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock, - curr_ios.timing); + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), desired_rate, curr_ios.timing); return; } @@ -371,11 +372,14 @@ static void msm_set_clock_rate_for_bus_mode(struct sdhci_host *host, * encounter it. */ achieved_rate = clk_get_rate(core_clk); - if (achieved_rate > clock) + if (achieved_rate > desired_rate) pr_warn("%s: Card appears overclocked; req %u Hz, actual %lu Hz\n", - mmc_hostname(host->mmc), clock, achieved_rate); + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), desired_rate, achieved_rate); + host->mmc->actual_clock = achieved_rate / mult; + + /* Stash the rate we requested to use in sdhci_msm_runtime_resume() */ + msm_host->clk_rate = desired_rate; - msm_host->clk_rate = clock; pr_debug("%s: Setting clock at rate %lu at timing %d\n", mmc_hostname(host->mmc), achieved_rate, curr_ios.timing); } @@ -1756,13 +1760,6 @@ static unsigned int sdhci_msm_get_min_clock(struct sdhci_host *host) static void __sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock) { u16 clk; - /* - * Keep actual_clock as zero - - * - since there is no divider used so no need of having actual_clock. - * - MSM controller uses SDCLK for data timeout calculation. If - * actual_clock is zero, host->clock is taken for calculation. - */ - host->mmc->actual_clock = 0; sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL); @@ -1785,7 +1782,7 @@ static void sdhci_msm_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock) struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host); if (!clock) { - msm_host->clk_rate = clock; + host->mmc->actual_clock = msm_host->clk_rate = 0; goto out; } -- 2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog