From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570DDC7EE24 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 09:25:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229639AbjFEJZF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 05:25:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229861AbjFEJZE (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2023 05:25:04 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12EEDD3; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 02:25:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1685957103; x=1717493103; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=n4xRGPRm/p5MAs4bYzHa8ejdar9i5Ity0Y5LODvyDkw=; b=BM91uQCa3k3EY01DsnjlGizv/GhuIqmOEZw+ziTtxiPt4S189d7ZAM/h AVyd4futzOG3GuUwuk0k3+/MR7nGke9yGBr2bGTcDlG2+/FDU8t7qXYGt qJoR2hKWzKjey6/Rcx+ewh1hN4K+eEbK/re5w5Prfr2q8zM8fyk4Lr6z7 9vHe6UBByInjABnaNkekvikNF9q/6rSoL5wcPaAR9VGuvI+sfJKr4dkVW TYO8NFBUoawC+efx47nF+DUwbzNwXgi+vWt6Pmbx9yyvb4/pp/XGZjPHi 9U7ZXEb718QcN1mQ1l0QQnGqnrHh9/5/Uxjxaky88afFTrv/ViUOruolX w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10731"; a="336679218" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,217,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="336679218" Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jun 2023 02:25:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10731"; a="711748842" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,217,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="711748842" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 15ab08e44a81) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2023 02:24:57 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 15ab08e44a81 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1q66SO-00044B-1B; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 09:24:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2023 17:24:20 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Wenbin Mei , Ulf Hansson Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Chaotian Jing , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Adrian Hunter , Ritesh Harjani , Asutosh Das , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Wenbin Mei Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mmc: mtk-sd: reduce CIT for better performance Message-ID: <202306051755.pR3fhYlB-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230605060107.22044-1-wenbin.mei@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230605060107.22044-1-wenbin.mei@mediatek.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Hi Wenbin, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on ulf-hansson-mmc-mirror/next v6.4-rc5 next-20230605] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wenbin-Mei/mmc-mtk-sd-reduce-CIT-for-better-performance/20230605-140238 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605060107.22044-1-wenbin.mei%40mediatek.com patch subject: [PATCH v3] mmc: mtk-sd: reduce CIT for better performance config: openrisc-randconfig-r035-20230605 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230605/202306051755.pR3fhYlB-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): mkdir -p ~/bin wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/225e46f420d48f7ad73253636a0553bd5f986435 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Wenbin-Mei/mmc-mtk-sd-reduce-CIT-for-better-performance/20230605-140238 git checkout 225e46f420d48f7ad73253636a0553bd5f986435 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.3.0 ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc olddefconfig COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.3.0 ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/mmc/host/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306051755.pR3fhYlB-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from ./arch/openrisc/include/generated/asm/div64.h:1, from include/linux/math.h:6, from include/linux/math64.h:6, from include/linux/time.h:6, from include/linux/stat.h:19, from include/linux/module.h:13, from drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:7: drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c: In function 'msdc_cqe_cit_cal': >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast 222 | (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \ | ^~ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2470:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2470 | do_div(hclk_freq, 1000); | ^~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5, from include/linux/container_of.h:5, from include/linux/list.h:5, from include/linux/module.h:12: >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:234:32: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] 234 | } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \ | ^~ include/linux/compiler.h:76:45: note: in definition of macro 'likely' 76 | # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) | ^ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2470:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2470 | do_div(hclk_freq, 1000); | ^~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:238:36: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 238 | __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \ | ^~~~ | | | u32 * {aka unsigned int *} drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2470:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2470 | do_div(hclk_freq, 1000); | ^~~~~~ include/asm-generic/div64.h:213:38: note: expected 'uint64_t *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'u32 *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} 213 | extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend, uint32_t divisor); | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast 222 | (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \ | ^~ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2473:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2473 | do_div(hclk_freq, 100); | ^~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:234:32: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] 234 | } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \ | ^~ include/linux/compiler.h:76:45: note: in definition of macro 'likely' 76 | # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) | ^ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2473:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2473 | do_div(hclk_freq, 100); | ^~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:238:36: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 238 | __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \ | ^~~~ | | | u32 * {aka unsigned int *} drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2473:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2473 | do_div(hclk_freq, 100); | ^~~~~~ include/asm-generic/div64.h:213:38: note: expected 'uint64_t *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'u32 *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} 213 | extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend, uint32_t divisor); | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:222:35: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast 222 | (void)(((typeof((n)) *)0) == ((uint64_t *)0)); \ | ^~ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2476:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2476 | do_div(hclk_freq, 10); | ^~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:234:32: warning: right shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] 234 | } else if (likely(((n) >> 32) == 0)) { \ | ^~ include/linux/compiler.h:76:45: note: in definition of macro 'likely' 76 | # define likely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 1) | ^ drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2476:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2476 | do_div(hclk_freq, 10); | ^~~~~~ >> include/asm-generic/div64.h:238:36: error: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 238 | __rem = __div64_32(&(n), __base); \ | ^~~~ | | | u32 * {aka unsigned int *} drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2476:25: note: in expansion of macro 'do_div' 2476 | do_div(hclk_freq, 10); | ^~~~~~ include/asm-generic/div64.h:213:38: note: expected 'uint64_t *' {aka 'long long unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'u32 *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} 213 | extern uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *dividend, uint32_t divisor); | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ >> drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c:2489:11: error: expected '}' before 'else' 2489 | } else { | ^~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +2489 drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c 2453 2454 static void msdc_cqe_cit_cal(struct msdc_host *host, u64 timer_ns) 2455 { 2456 struct mmc_host *mmc = mmc_from_priv(host); 2457 struct cqhci_host *cq_host = mmc->cqe_private; 2458 u8 itcfmul; 2459 u32 hclk_freq; 2460 u64 value; 2461 2462 /* Since MSDC CQE uses msdc_hclk as ITCFVAL, so driver should use hclk 2463 * frequency to get the actual time for CIT. 2464 */ 2465 if (host->h_clk) { 2466 hclk_freq = clk_get_rate(host->h_clk); 2467 itcfmul = CQHCI_CAP_ITCFMUL(cqhci_readl(cq_host, CQHCI_CAP)); 2468 switch (itcfmul) { 2469 case 0x0: 2470 do_div(hclk_freq, 1000); 2471 break; 2472 case 0x1: 2473 do_div(hclk_freq, 100); 2474 break; 2475 case 0x2: 2476 do_div(hclk_freq, 10); 2477 break; 2478 case 0x3: 2479 break; 2480 case 0x4: 2481 hclk_freq = hclk_freq * 10; 2482 break; 2483 default: 2484 host->cq_ssc1_time = 0x40; 2485 return; 2486 value = hclk_freq * timer_ns; 2487 do_div(value, 1000000000ULL); 2488 host->cq_ssc1_time = value; > 2489 } else { 2490 host->cq_ssc1_time = 0x40; 2491 } 2492 } 2493 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki