linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Alex Lemberg <Alex.Lemberg@sandisk.com>
Cc: "ulf.hansson@linaro.org" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"chris@printf.net" <chris@printf.net>,
	Avi Shchislowski <Avi.Shchislowski@sandisk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: Add Production State Awareness Support
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:42:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5477383C.7010306@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <282CEDFCBC30114F83C499CB8F2ED5333ECC1D9C@SACMBXIP02.sdcorp.global.sandisk.com>

Hi, Alex.

On 11/27/2014 10:59 PM, Alex Lemberg wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaehoon Chung [mailto:jh80.chung@samsung.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:02 AM
>> To: Alex Lemberg
>> Cc: ulf.hansson@linaro.org; linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; chris@printf.net; Avi
>> Shchislowski
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: Add Production State Awareness Support
>>
>> Hi, Alex.
>>
>> On 11/27/2014 01:38 AM, Alex Lemberg wrote:
>>> Hi Jaehoon,
>>>
>>> Thank you for reviewing the patch.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jaehoon Chung [mailto:jh80.chung@samsung.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 6:33 AM
>>>> To: Alex Lemberg; ulf.hansson@linaro.org
>>>> Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org; chris@printf.net; Avi Shchislowski
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: Add Production State Awareness Support
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2014 12:01 AM, Alex Lemberg wrote:
>>>>> In this patch driver should recognize if eMMC device (Rev >=5.0) was
>>>>> left in PRE_SOLDERING_POST_WRITES (0x02) state, and switch it to
>>>>> NORMAL (0x00).
>>>>> PRE_SOLDERING_POST_WRITES (0x02) state - represents a state where
>>>>> the device is in production process and the host (usually
>>>>> programmer) completed loading the content to the device.
>>>>> The host (usually programmer) sets the device to this state after
>>>>> loading the content and just before soldering.
>>>>> After soldering the device to the real host (not programmer), the
>>>>> device should be switched to NORMAL (0x00) mode.
>>>>> The NORMAL (0x00) mode of PSA register represents a state in which
>>>>> the device is running in the field and uses regular operations.
>>>>> Leaving device in PRE_SOLDERING_POST_WRITES (0x02) might cause
>>>>> unexpected behaviour of eMMC device.
>>>>>
>>>>> More details about PSA feature can be found in eMMC5.0 JEDEC spec
>>>> (JESD84-B50.pdf):
>>>>> http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/technology-focus-areas/flas
>>>>> h-
>>>>> memory-ssds-ufs-emmc/e-mmc
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@sandisk.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>>>  - Remove typo in patch code
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c   | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  include/linux/mmc/card.h |  2 ++
>>>>>  include/linux/mmc/mmc.h  |  8 ++++++++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c index
>>>>> 02ad792..3923c90 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>>> @@ -571,6 +571,16 @@ static int mmc_decode_ext_csd(struct mmc_card
>>>> *card, u8 *ext_csd)
>>>>>  		card->ext_csd.ffu_capable =
>>>>>  			(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SUPPORTED_MODE] & 0x1) &&
>>>>>  			!(ext_csd[EXT_CSD_FW_CONFIG] & 0x1);
>>>>> +		card->ext_csd.psa =
>>>>> +			ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PSA];
>>>>> +		if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PSA_TIMEOUT] > 0) {
>>>>> +			card->ext_csd.psa_timeout =
>>>>> +				100 *
>>>>> +				(1 << ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PSA_TIMEOUT]);
>>>>> +		} else {
>>>>> +			pr_warn("%s: EXT_CSD PSA Timeout is zero\n",
>>>>> +					mmc_hostname(card->host));
>>>>
>>>> I remembered Ulf's previous comment. Did you check it?
>>> Are you referring to psa_timeout?
>>> In case it is zero, we are printing warning, and let host controller
>>> to handle this.
>>> Every switch command timeout setting in mmc driver done in this way.
>>
>> pr_warn() doesn't need.
> 
> OK
> 
>>
>>>>
>>>>> +		}
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>  out:
>>>>>  	return err;
>>>>> @@ -1331,6 +1341,24 @@ static int mmc_init_card(struct mmc_host
>>>>> *host,
>>>> u32 ocr,
>>>>>  		mmc_set_dsr(host);
>>>>>
>>>>>  	/*
>>>>> +	 * eMMC v5.0 or later
>>>>> +	 * and Production State Awareness state is
>>>>> +	 * EXT_CSD_PSA_POST_SOLDERING_WRITES (0x02)
>>>>> +	 * The host should set the device to NORMAL mode
>>>>> +	 */
>>>>> +	if ((card->ext_csd.rev >= 7) &&
>>>>> +		(card->ext_csd.psa ==
>>>> EXT_CSD_PSA_POST_SOLDERING_WRITES)) {
>>>>
>>>> Is it right? how did you get "revision"?
>>>
>>> In linux-next, the EXT_CSD revision set was moved to
>>> mmc_decode_ext_csd() function.
>>> Anyway, thanks for pointing me on this, I will move this check to the
>>> right place.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +		unsigned int timeout;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		timeout = DIV_ROUND_UP(card->ext_csd.psa_timeout, 1000);
>>>>> +		card->ext_csd.psa = EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL;
>>>>
>>>> Why did card->ext_csd.psa assign to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL as hard-
>> coding?
>>>>
>>> I think this is a right way to set ext_csd structure in order to
>>> prevent additional read from device ext_csd register, which was already read
>> during the init.
>>
>> I think you assume that card is already initialized.
>>
>> In my understanding for your code.
>> a) init time
>> 	card->ext_csd.psa assigned to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL. (hard coding)
>> 	And switch to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL.
>> b) If oldcard doesn't present, try to read ext_csd register.
>> 	Then EXT_CSD_PSA was always set to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL. isn't?
>> 	And card->ext_csd.psa is re-assigned to EXT_CSD_PSA register value.
>> 	(It's also EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL, because it's switched to
>> EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMA at 'a)' )
>>
>> If i missed something, let me know.
> 
> 'b)' is performed before 'a)'
> The card->ext_csd.psa is read from device before we check and set it to NORMAL.
> The code flow is:
> mmc_init_card(...)
> {
> 	...
> 	1) If oldcard doesn't present, try to read ext_csd register.
> 		The card->ext_csd.psa will be set with device register value
> 	...	
> 	2) if card->ext_csd.psa is EXT_CSD_PSA_POST_SOLDERING_WRITES
> 		Set card->ext_csd.psa to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL. (hard coding)
> 		And switch to EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL
> 	...
> }
> 
> Does it makes more sense now?

Sorry, i missed that checking EXT_CSD_PSA_POST_SOLDERING_WIRTES.
Then you need to relocated this at correct place.(To get ext_csd value), right?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> +		err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>>>> +			EXT_CSD_PSA, card->ext_csd.psa, timeout);
>>
>> If you need to change,
>> 		err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>> EXT_CSD_PSA,
>> 			EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL, timeout);
>>
>> Anyway, this sequence is something strange.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Jaehoon Chung
>>>>> +		if (err && err != -EBADMSG)
>>>>> +			goto free_card;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/*
>>>>>  	 * Select card, as all following commands rely on that.
>>>>>  	 */
>>>>>  	if (!mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>>>> index
>>>>> 4d69c00..09ac3b0 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
>>>>> @@ -60,9 +60,11 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
>>>>>  	u8			packed_event_en;
>>>>>  	unsigned int		part_time;		/* Units: ms */
>>>>>  	unsigned int		sa_timeout;		/* Units: 100ns */
>>>>> +	unsigned int		psa_timeout;		/* Units: 100us */
>>>>>  	unsigned int		generic_cmd6_time;	/* Units: 10ms */
>>>>>  	unsigned int            power_off_longtime;     /* Units: ms */
>>>>>  	u8			power_off_notification;	/* state */
>>>>> +	u8			psa; /* production state awareness */
>>>>>  	unsigned int		hs_max_dtr;
>>>>>  	unsigned int		hs200_max_dtr;
>>>>>  #define MMC_HIGH_26_MAX_DTR	26000000
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h index
>>>>> 49ad7a9..458814d 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
>>>>> @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_EXP_EVENTS_STATUS	54	/* RO, 2 bytes */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_EXP_EVENTS_CTRL		56	/* R/W, 2
>> bytes */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_DATA_SECTOR_SIZE	61	/* R */
>>>>> +#define EXT_CSD_PSA			133	/* R/W/E */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_GP_SIZE_MULT		143	/* R/W */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SETTING_COMPLETED 155	/* R/W */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_PARTITION_ATTRIBUTE	156	/* R/W */
>>>>> @@ -315,6 +316,7 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_PWR_CL_26_360		203	/* RO */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT			212	/* RO, 4 bytes */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_S_A_TIMEOUT		217	/* RO */
>>>>> +#define EXT_CSD_PSA_TIMEOUT		218	/* RO */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_REL_WR_SEC_C		222	/* RO */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_HC_WP_GRP_SIZE		221	/* RO */
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_ERASE_TIMEOUT_MULT	223	/* RO */
>>>>> @@ -433,6 +435,12 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
>>>>>  #define EXT_CSD_BKOPS_LEVEL_2		0x2
>>>>>
>>>>>  /*
>>>>> + * PRODUCTION STATE AWARENESS fields  */
>>>>> +#define EXT_CSD_PSA_NORMAL		0x00
>>>>> +#define EXT_CSD_PSA_POST_SOLDERING_WRITES	0x02
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>>   * MMC_SWITCH access modes
>>>>>   */
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-27 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26 16:38 [PATCH v2] mmc: Add Production State Awareness Support Alex Lemberg
2014-11-27  9:02 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-11-27 13:59   ` Alex Lemberg
2014-11-27 14:42     ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2014-12-02  8:55       ` Alex Lemberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-25 15:01 Alex Lemberg
2014-11-26  4:33 ` Jaehoon Chung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5477383C.7010306@samsung.com \
    --to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=Alex.Lemberg@sandisk.com \
    --cc=Avi.Shchislowski@sandisk.com \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).