linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:38:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKfqMoM3WdaG8o0JHpXeUZHYpLt4P15BsOriU2h2OV--A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4kuJAwV7f=pjUqs1nO3+L5NbcwCQrCi-HGUPPXgp7rWUs=g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:27, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/10/19 8:58 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops as a preparation in case some
> > > host controllers have different method to complete one request, such as
> > > supporting request completion of MMC software queue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |    2 ++
> > >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > index b056400..850241f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > @@ -2729,7 +2729,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > >
> > >       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > -     mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> > > +     if (host->ops->request_done)
> > > +             host->ops->request_done(host, mrq);
> >
> > For hsq, couldn't this result in sdhci_request() being called interrupt
> > context here.
>
> Right, now it did not support.
>
> >
> > To prevent that you would need to add a condition to sdhci_defer_done() so
> > it always defers when using hsq.
>
> Yes, but now the condition can be matched in sdhci_defer_done()  when
> using hsq. So no need to worry that the sdhci_request() will be called
> in interrupt
> context in this patch set. Thanks.
>

Wait, sorry, I realized some drivers may not select the
SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA flag in sdhci_defer_done()  when using hsq. OK, So
how about below changes?

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 850241f..6c7a396 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static inline bool sdhci_defer_done(struct
sdhci_host *host,
 {
        struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;

-       return host->pending_reset ||
+       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC_HSQ) || host->pending_reset ||
               ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && data &&
                data->host_cookie == COOKIE_MAPPED);
 }

-- 
Baolin Wang
Best Regards

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-28  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-22  5:58 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add MMC software queue support Baolin Wang
2019-10-22  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: Add MMC host " Baolin Wang
2019-10-22  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops Baolin Wang
2019-10-28  8:19   ` Adrian Hunter
2019-10-28  8:27     ` Baolin Wang
2019-10-28  8:38       ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2019-10-28  9:10         ` Adrian Hunter
2019-10-28  9:15           ` Baolin Wang
2019-10-22  5:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: Add software queue support Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMz4kuKfqMoM3WdaG8o0JHpXeUZHYpLt4P15BsOriU2h2OV--A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).