From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
To: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (EXT) Re: Consistent block device references for root= cmdline
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:14:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFptySRTbWto9QYWZ-feL51JvPkZDGsETJ4svz0VbV31Bw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfcec3df57e6dd5ef353ef3a5b4b9793c28eb401.camel@ew.tq-group.com>
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 13:20, Matthias Schiffer
<matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 16:52 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:15, Matthias Schiffer
> > <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > there have been numerous attempts to make the numbering of mmcblk
> > > devices consistent, mostly by using aliases from the DTS ([1], [2],
> > > [3]), but all have been (rightfully) rejected. Unless I have
> > > overlooked
> > > a more recent development, no attempts for a different solution
> > > were
> > > made.
> >
> > According to aliases attempts, I think those have failed, mainly
> > because of two reasons.
> >
> > 1. Arguments stating that LABELs/UUIDs are variable alternatives.
> > This
> > isn't the case, which I think was also concluded from the several
> > earlier discussions.
> > 2. Patches that tried adding support for mmc aliases, were not
> > correctly coded. More precisely, what needs to be addressed is that
> > the mmc core also preserves the same ids to be set for the host class
> > as the block device, mmc[n] must correspond to mmcblk[n].
> >
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, the core of the issue seems to be the
> > > following:
> > >
> > > The existing solutions like LABELs and UUIDs are viable
> > > alternatives in
> > > many cases, but in particular on embedded systems, this is not
> > > quite
> > > sufficient: In addition to the problem that more knowledge about
> > > the
> > > system to boot is required in the bootloader, this approach fails
> > > completely when the same firmware image exists on multiple devices,
> > > for
> > > example on an eMMC and an SD card - not an entirely uncommon
> > > situation
> > > during the development of embedded systems.
> > >
> > > With udev, I can refer to a specific partition using a path like
> > > /dev/disk/by-path/platform-2194000.usdhc-part2. In [4] it was
> > > proposed
> > > to add a way to refer to a device path/phandle from the kernel
> > > command
> > > line. Has there been any progress on this proposal?
> >
> > Lots of time during the years I have been approached, both publicly
> > and offlist, about whether it would be possible to add support for
> > "consistent" mmcblk devices. To me, I am fine with the aliases
> > approach, as long as it gets implemented correctly.
>
>
> It seems the principal technical problem is the one described here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26602.html
>
> I don't see any way to solve this completely, as there seem to be two
> fundamentally conflicting requirements:
>
> 1) If a mounted SD card is replaced, it must be assigned a new
> /dev/mmcblkN
> 2) /dev/mmcblkN should always match the configured alias IDs
>
> What is the reason we need 1) - is it possible to have multiple eMMCs
> or SD cards on a single bus, with detection at runtime?
Yes. The mmc_bus_type holds all cards - all discovered at runtime.
> Otherwise I'd
> expect this to be handled like other drives with removable media (CD,
> floppy), with static device assignment.
>
> If we can't give up on 1) for some reason, we'll have to accept that we
> can't guarantee 2) unconditionally. As far as I can tell, the patches
> provided by Sascha and others did that in a reasonable way: The aliases
> would work in most cases - in particular for the first assignment on
> boot, which is required to find the correct rootfs.
Well, if we would pre-parse the DTB to look for all "mmc block
aliases" and keep a mark of those ids as being reserved, then we
should be able to cope with both 1) and 2).
>
> >
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8685711/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/674381/
> > > [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26586.html
> > > [4] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg26708.html
> > >
> >
Kind regards
Uffe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 13:15 Consistent block device references for root= cmdline Matthias Schiffer
2020-06-10 14:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-06-10 17:33 ` Roger Heflin
2020-06-11 11:23 ` (EXT) " Matthias Schiffer
2020-06-11 11:20 ` Matthias Schiffer
2020-07-07 14:14 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2020-07-29 8:43 ` (EXT) " Matthias Schiffer
2020-08-05 7:50 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPDyKFptySRTbWto9QYWZ-feL51JvPkZDGsETJ4svz0VbV31Bw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).